Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
by mtain-dg02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AA6703800009A;
Wed, 6 Feb 2013 12:43:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1U38mr-0005wi-72
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:27:57 +0000
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1U38mq-0005wZ-Qq
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:27:56 +0000
Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242])
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77)
(envelope-from <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>)
id 1U38mp-0004tX-8k
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:27:55 +0000
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Au8LAB12ElFOlrdN/2dsb2JhbABFinO0TgR+F3OCGgUBAQQBCAEBAyUBIwImBgEBAwUCAQMRBAEBCiUUAQQaBhYIBhMKAQICAQGHegq8NY0kFBlhgykDiDCFV5hsgn4
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,615,1355097600";
d="scan'208";a="565055344"
Received: from host-78-150-183-77.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.150.183.77])
by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 06 Feb 2013 17:27:33 +0000
Message-ID: <001d01ce048f$3ced6b70$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
From: "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <CAKvcm2es=Zhf-LRz4vSF2mnNXTFJm0XYHyB8EK-x2hW7Fu8UDA@mail.gmail.com> <72D88C6C0DAA4B379CBBCA695EF47BF0@White> <9C06F775D1344822B5D30EBBAB8AA144@AGB> <CAKvcm2f8+iLxf5VeN6LQ3LSefevnuFvt0o1RD=G1U32dJjh=yQ@mail.gmail.com> <51128C6E.1040505@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:27:28 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Spam-Score: 3.6 (+++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Stefan Are you saying it is all guesswork ??? 10 dB either
way !! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 5:01
PM Subject: Re: LF: declared power on WSPR [...]
Content analysis details: (3.6 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
3.6 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2
X-Scan-Signature: b77892ad90d0261eaf071f4f6cf31464
Subject: Re: LF: declared power on WSPR
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410a51129648638e
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none
Stefan
Are you saying it is all guesswork ??? 10 dB either way !!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefan Schäfer" <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: LF: declared power on WSPR
> Hi Dimitris,
>
> Am 06.02.2013 00:18, schrieb Dimitrios Tsifakis:
> > [...]
> >
> > A reason for the discrepancy between different "1 W" values may be
> > that the majority of amateurs would calculate rather than measure the
> > radiated power. And as we all know, the majority of back-yard antennas
> > are not quite lab reference antennas. If anything, I would guess that
> > calculated radiated power is overestimated compared to reality.
> >
> > 73, Dimitris
> >
>
> Yes, that's the reason :-)
>
> 73, Stefan
>
>