Message-ID: <001d01cc5e98$e6a4ed30$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
From: "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <001501cc5e83$6f32d1f0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4E4E9C93.8080708@legal-medicine.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:53:28 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: fERRITE JOY STICK
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404a4e4ea35a766e
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


Peter
According to my research output is increased by strapping a number of rods
together in parallel, then winding with suitable wire for the required
inductance.
High sensitivity is Achieved by Bunching a number of rods together to
increase Loop Area
There are also advantages linking some rods end to end.
de mal/g3kev


----- Original Message -----
From: "pws" <pws@legal-medicine.de>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: LF: fERRITE JOY STICK


> Hi Mal,
>
> You wrote:
> > ...
> > I happen to have  a bunch of 9 ferrite rods 100mm long and wound
>  > ...
>
> Bundling is not worth the effort.
> In case of ferrite loop sticks length is what matters.
>
>  > ...
> >This is just a fun experiment for me because I do not need any
>  > more antennas at this qth
>  > ...
>
> Mephistopheles:
> "My good sir, you observe this matter
> As men these matters always see;
> But we must manage that much better
> Before life's pleasures from us flee."
>
> [°_^]
>
> Greetings from the Continent,
> Peter, df3lp
>