Return-Path: Received: from mtain-db12.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-db12.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.96]) by air-db09.mail.aol.com (v128.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDB092-86234bb487602c8; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 07:45:36 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-db12.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D739C380000C1; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 07:45:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NxIoz-0005RL-QX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:44:25 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NxIoz-0005RC-EG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:44:25 +0100 Received: from smtp823.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.19]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NxIox-0005N6-IS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:44:25 +0100 Received: (qmail 76275 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 11:44:17 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=bhPOG1tjIhqdWMkRo/hNFNXABtDrtpi6tAPyUkPj6I2MVy119kOYIW68ZaiRPplOXhQh9Fn9/9tm4remqtblSCz1/kHaZalyKOVS8qE+LRnNe63rudDavNCPS3WcbLcmRMuPpE86IZYitou0VKkDu/2dD/mDD1nK5nVWk5DYPrU= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1270122257; bh=Gq3EkxB62xSVONqrSKB/GWI0imb+y1BwaCfZWvzwAts=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=oL3dxXubQDSHK8DUGdnB+36xn2XktAOBkmeH5a72VBcmqNTu6H04batl5fkarucDiwAfCaUAR33QVWCYnAkfBajTUm18UapHYKhnAKzJo6b2HRH/7kLGWu07ZtDRDsbyAR/jMmF0EXabbDSRc86HvOQRNntdMWYVVuuwinTnwEo= Received: from lark (alan.melia@81.131.20.29 with login) by smtp823.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 01 Apr 2010 11:44:16 +0000 GMT X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- X-YMail-OSG: .Uiq9LgVM1k7oWgG1ykI0N_2YCjT_7bz3HiO9UaqsJ5cGjbX5JMqUA4vE95dRSGSc9thZJ28IfD5t3c8S4xFmg0Xr3orCmwXw89THHwx.YBf74t531ji21qNxly2PNHNnk3yOGYR5kNNvYVLfvUEd74oJQQE6oG9jLL0.WYgZyffdGeeW3BuHCzb.68bbCrtrknbO.C5T_s6c0j7nqUpr1eAN2PJT9mXOBuujoHFFklX2hxFZ_ro_105BXoMOJeZAkh75UwHiRS95J8FTaX6tdbnZRSe3JFV X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <001d01cad190$aa92e590$0901a8c0@lark> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 12:44:15 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1983 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1983 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: LF: Re: E-Field Probe calibration question Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d236.1 ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40604bb4875e55b3 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Hi Andy maybe I dont read it right, but if that is an E-field probe it is not a "dipole" The input capacitance senses the voltage at two points on the wavefront. The ground plane is, I believe, irrelevant. You just need another capacitance separated from the "probe" to reference to voltage to. See Renato's balanced probe (www.vlf.it) In your case this is the car.....but it could be the size of a dinky toy.The area of the wavefront intercepted by the probe or the ground reference does not affect the terminal voltage.....as I see it.................of course I might just be wrong cos i am really a scientist not an enjuneir!! :-)) Alan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andy Talbot" To: Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 12:02 PM Subject: LF: E-Field Probe calibration question > I have a calibrated E Field antenna (Procomm AAC-1) with a quoted > antenna-factor of 0.15V into 50 ohms when placed in a field of 1V/m, > > This is mounted in the centre of a car roof and fed via a bulkhead connector > to a calibrated measuring receiver inside the vehicle, which we can assume > is a Faraday cage at LF, S0 my question is : How is the effective height > of the antenna changed? It was 0.15m - the specification said so - but > this would have been over an infinite groundplane. Do I regard the body of > the car as being the other half of a dipole? In which case, at 1.5m it adds > 20dB to the received signal and makes a mockery of calibrated measurement of > the E-Field value.. > > Is it worth persuing this route, or better to stick to untuned loops for > calibrated E-Field measurements at LF/MF? > > > Andy > www.g4jnt.com >