Message-ID: <001d01c22816$ecb6f500$c00b0805@globocabo.com.br>
From: "PY3CRX PY2PLL" <py2pll@py.qsl.br>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <000201c22792$e70d1d20$b04101d5@main>
Subject: LF: Re: re LITX wire v enamelled
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:37:21 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Hi Alan ...

> Hi Marcus, I have not much experience with ferrite rods, but the article
in
> Electronics World for August 2002 (mentioned in an earlier posting) does
> evaluate various rod configurations for efficiency. I think the conclusion
> is that you cannot achieve the effective height that you can easily
achieve
> with an open loop. They measure a 0.77m diam 38 turn loop with an
effective
> height of 9metres !!  The best performance ferrrite rod aerial was an
> effective height of 1.8m using 12 rods 200mm x 10mm. They dismiss it as
> usefull only as a portable test aerial.

Well, I don't have this article but the figures you'd mentioned was enough
to make me review some concepts.

I have a loop but using .5mm computer flat cable - those used to connect
HD/floppies to computer board - and the coupling via 1 turn loop, 30 turns
on a octagon PVC structure with 6 meter perimeter. The wire spacing is
roughly 1mm BUT there's the flat cable PVC dielectric. So the ressonance was
much lower than predicted the Rejloop program.

Seems that I'll have some hard (but not so) work winding this air loop with
#24 gauge, some milimeter spacing ... and migrating the ferrite rod
pre-amp/tunning ckt to it.

No pain no gain ... :o/

Thanks on the comments ...

73
Marcus
PY3CRX/PY2PLL
S. B. do Campo - GG66rf
http://py.qsl.br
Active from "DC" to 24GHz