Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28186 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2001 00:40:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Dec 2001 00:40:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 11447 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2001 00:41:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Dec 2001 00:41:08 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 169yBl-0006XA-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2001 00:39:29 +0000 Received: from dc-mx08.cluster0.hsacorp.net ([209.225.8.18] helo=dc-mx08.cluster1.charter.net) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 169yBk-0006X5-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2001 00:39:28 +0000 Received: from [24.216.235.182] (HELO johncellar) by dc-mx08.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with SMTP id 52809620 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 19:46:17 -0500 Message-ID: <001d01c17a00$82cf58e0$0300a8c0@charter.net> From: "John Andrews" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <3C0813D6.28D093B3@att.net> <002501c179fb$f8965b00$0400000a@parissn2> Subject: LF: Re: Re: 75 kHz HBG +50db above noise in NC Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 19:38:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Stewart, > Also, is the following about the FSK signals correct? > On about 73.6 kHz is CFH (75 Hz shift and 75 BPS) > and on about 73.3 kHz is Rugby (100 Hz shift and 100 BPS). I have only seen listings in The Lowdown for CFH being on 73.6. They certainly haven't been there in the last week, as the signal would be overpowering here in Massachusetts. The center frequency for Rugby is 73.25 as seen here, and the signal is exactly 100 Hz wide. It is a few dB stronger here tonight than it was at this UTC time on Tuesday. John Andrews, W1TAG