Message-ID: <001d01c175b1$0b29bb30$0400000a@parissn2>
From: "Stewart Nelson" <sn@scgroup.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <4f.14ca23c4.293040de@aol.com> <007401c174d6$fc38f8a0$a3ca28c3@ericadodd> <001501c174ec$f212b260$0300a8c0@charter.net> <000201c1751b$6063bb00$3dce28c3@ericadodd> <3C000DE3.AED73455@att.net> <3C0011CB.3156569C@att.net>
Subject: LF: RTTY on 73.3 kHz?
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 13:59:38 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>


Dexter McIntyre W4DEX wrote:

> Just for grins, I recorded a 15 sec .wav file of the 73.3 kHz RTTY
> signal and uploaded it at:
> 
> www.qsl.net/w4dex/73khzRTTY.wav

> It sounds strong enough I almost believe it would print here
> if the static crashes were absent.

Many thanks, Dexter, for the great puzzle.  Unfortunately, I failed
miserably trying to solve it.  Although this is an FSK signal,
I don't think it is RTTY in the usual sense.  Does anyone know the
format (or at least the source)?

The apparent baud rate is 74.99; of course this is affected by the
sampling rate of Dexter's sound card.  The frequency shift is also
very close to 75 Hz, but I don't believe that it's precisely one
carrier cycle per bit time, because attempts at coherent detection
were unsuccessful.  However, even with a time-between-zero-crossings
detector, the S/N was quite good (with aggressive predetect filtering).
I considered a bit questionable when its frequency offset was less
than 40% of average; only one of 1142 bits failed this test.
So I'm confident that the data is nearly correct.  Unfortunately,
I couldn't find any start or stop bits, any sign of a character
length, any repeating patterns, or any other indication that it
is anything but random.  I suspect that this data is compressed,
encrypted, uses ECC, or perhaps all of the above.

If you can make any sense of the message below, let us know. "X"
might be one or zero, "." is the opposite.

...X.XX.X.XX..XXX..X.XXX.X...XX..X...X..X...X.X..XX...X...X....X...XXX..
X..XX.X..XXX.X.XXX.XXX.XX..XX.X.X.XXXXX.X.....XXXXX...X.....XXX..X.XXXXX
.XX.X.X.XXX...XXXXX..XX..XX..XXX..X.X.XX.X.X.XX......X..XXX..XX.XXXXX..X
...XX.XXXX..XXXX.X..X.XXXX.X........X.X.XXXX?XXXX.XX.....XXX.XXX...X....
XX.X.X......XX.X..XXX...XXXXX..X.XX.XX..XX....X...XXXXXX.XXXX...X..XXX..
.X.X..X.XXXXX..XX.X...XXX....XX.X.XX.X....X.XX..X....XXXXXX.X.X...X..X.X
....X.XXX..X.X...XX...X..XX.X..XX.X.......XXX.X..X.X.X.X.XX.....X..XX...
X.X..XX..X.XXX..XX.XXX.X...X....XX.X......X...X.XXX.X.XX..XXX..X.....XX.
.X..X.XXXXX...X.X.X.X.X..XXXXX...X.XX..X.....XXX.XX.XXX...XXXXX..XXX.XXX
...X.X....XX..XXXX.XXXXXX.XX..X.XX.X...XXXXXXXXXXXX..X.......XXX.X.X..XX
XXX..XXX...XX.XXX.X..X......XXX.X....X.X.X.....X...XX.X..XX..X..X.X.X...
..X....XXX.X......X..XX.X..X....X.XX.X...X.X.X...X.XXXX.X.X.X..XX...X..X
.X..X..XX.X.....XX.X.XX.XXXX......X.X.X..X..X....X..X..X.X..X..XX.XX..X.
XXXX...X...X.X.XXXX....X.X.XXXX.XX.XX...XX.XX......X.XXX.XX..X..X.....XX
X.X.XXX.X....XXXX.X.XXX..XXX.....X.X.XXX.XX...X..XXXXXXXX.X.X.X.XX.XX..X
XX..X..XX........XX..X.XX...XX.XXX....X.XX..X....X..XXX...XXXX

73,

Stewart KK7KA