Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Mon, 23 May 2005 13:43:11 +0100 Received: by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DaCH1-0001fJ-6z for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 23 May 2005 13:43:11 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DaCH1-0001ew-26 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 23 May 2005 13:43:11 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DaCGi-0002gd-OJ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 May 2005 13:42:52 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DaCGi-0002gU-DG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 May 2005 13:42:52 +0100 Received: from smtp-out1.hurontel.on.ca ([216.46.129.246]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DaCGg-0000lB-TO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 May 2005 13:42:52 +0100 Received: from mail.hurontel.on.ca (mail.hurontel.on.ca [216.46.129.11]) by smtp-out1.hurontel.on.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j4NCagYF015330 for ; Mon, 23 May 2005 08:36:45 -0400 Received: from server (dial170-ripley2.hurontel.on.ca [216.46.149.170]) by mail.hurontel.on.ca (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with SMTP id j4NChBV1028722 for ; Mon, 23 May 2005 08:43:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <001c01c55f8d$5e183780$8e802ed8@server> From: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000c01c55a6e$8d82f740$37d0fc3e@l8p8y6> <000d01c55b45$acb45e60$ac068351@w4o8m9> <002f01c55d97$09df4840$8c802ed8@server> <000901c55d99$bb7d7cf0$0700a8c0@Laptop> <005201c55e00$e1f57ce0$8c802ed8@server> <001901c55e4e$6ceda1e0$0500a8c0@charter.net> <003a01c55ebe$f98b99c0$b7952ed8@server> <000201c55f81$6f552c80$83e8fc3e@l8p8y6> Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 12:48:15 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 216.46.129.246 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of hurontel.on.ca Subject: LF: Re: Loop antenna problem, W1TAG suggestion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) > > This is probably the best approach for your loop, or any series or parallel > arrangment I use a parallel resonating approach on my 80 m perimeter > vertical loop and never had a problem. > > G3KEV > Hello Mal, LFers, Thanks for the input. As I told John yesterday, I'm going to wind a xfmr and give that approach a try. I plan on using a toroid core from an old computer power supply, as that's all I have available. 73, J.B.