Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25740 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2003 09:47:13 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by netmail00.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 8 Aug 2003 09:47:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 15742 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2003 09:47:16 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 8 Aug 2003 09:47:16 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19l3pY-0002LB-3W for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2003 10:46:40 +0100 Received: from [212.159.14.219] (helo=netmail01.services.quay.plus.net) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 4.14) id 19l3pT-0002L2-TZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2003 10:46:35 +0100 Received: (qmail 17237 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2003 09:46:05 -0000 Received: from ctuash.plus.com (HELO Hugh) (212.159.90.113) by netmail01.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 8 Aug 2003 09:46:05 -0000 Message-ID: <001c01c35d91$b4996a20$3704210a@Hugh> From: "Hugh M0WYE" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5.1.0.14.0.20030808100142.02557250@gemini.herts.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 10:44:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: Re: WA0AKG/SAQ - yes it was... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0tests=ORIGINAL_MESSAGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCESversion=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Congratulations Jim, and well spotted. It amuses me to think that SAQ now has more listeners than when it was in commercial service. 73 Hugh M0WYE ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Moritz" To: Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 10:21 AM Subject: LF: Re: WA0AKG/SAQ - yes it was... > Back in July... > >Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 13:45:05 +0100 > >To: LF Group > >From: James Moritz > >Subject: WA0AKG/SAQ - who he? > > > >Dear LF Group, > > > >I was just transferring some recordings I made of SAQ onto a CD-ROM to > >send to the station - when I noticed at the very end of the 1030utc > >broadcast, just before hearing the alternator note running down, somebody > >sent "de WA0AKG/SAQ". Did anyone else notice this? Was this WA0AKG's bid > >to sidestep the FCC's decision not to allow LF amateur radio? I think we > >should be told...Maybe he will QSL... > > Dear LF Group, > > I have now received a QSL card from Richard, WA0AKG - it was indeed him at > the key at SAQ. He happened to be visiting the Grimeton site that day, and > was thrilled when they let him have a go at the end of one of the > broadcasts. I sent him a copy of my recording on CD , so now he has it > recorded for posterity. > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU > > >