Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.1.100 with SMTP id 4csp21943igl; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 05:38:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.14.110.194 with SMTP id u42mr35913541eeg.128.1373459891866; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 05:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i44si24454587eew.127.2013.07.10.05.38.11 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 05:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Uwt8E-0006IC-E5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:04:26 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Uwt8D-0006I3-QN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:04:25 +0100 Received: from qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.59.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Uwt8B-0005LP-0F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:04:24 +0100 Received: from omta20.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.71]) by qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ybbR1l0041YDfWL5Ec4L9A; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:04:20 +0000 Received: from DELL4 ([71.234.119.9]) by omta20.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id yc4L1l00C0CFS1j3gc4Lei; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:04:20 +0000 Message-ID: <001b01ce7d65$9c448c30$6d01a8c0@DELL4> From: To: References: <51D975FA.60008@virginbroadband.com.au> <51DD1434.2030300@virginbroadband.com.au> <51DD2EB1.80303@aol.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:04:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1373457861; bh=Ew+T8qehAQEhv3QdjUhsQKKH84YzeXUkPAIGYABdffc=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=S6d0hNJSh3y5fRl+rMqf+Wkd/6n6sJDB4S4NMF4/2Av1ORYmlS/qBlKmBki12XYkt s1qA/Bn9SxIsXdPrzOSlnH+PGbRuvdXFeQE2stgcXlV89xVdCxnMB1ry+mJ8Xx1oQ/ Kxp6bj3fm5XvrcRD81CE30uOv2ZoJo7hbYRy3KHQsHcyELnVMu6iie3kwrp3L9Mp38 q5JaZ/6WRapZ8C1rZ+Z8CThZ4Nrywtf8CPgJg3KYrJPZNxMS0k7rxtEK0KIUl6oW0w ckPyZHmirsK5p3GL0cWEDlHS5V8SFeEtAqjQFvdeGrMjk9OdUFSAFihqtx5QJfOorT L/QpHicFx8j9A== X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Pat Don't believe they are 'loading up' the spacecraft itself against the universe ;~). Antennas take the form of monopoles (spacecraft is the 'groundplane'), dipoles, quad helix etc. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: pat To: edgar Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 5:51 AM Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna [...] Content analysis details: (1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.59.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 1.7 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D X-Scan-Signature: eb65b97b00a71049be1fa526941c7b31 Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0018_01CE7D44.14E1E600" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1842 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01CE7D44.14E1E600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pat Don't believe they are 'loading up' the spacecraft itself against the = universe ;~). Antennas take the form of monopoles (spacecraft is the = 'groundplane'), dipoles, quad helix etc. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: pat=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Cc: edgar=20 Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 5:51 AM Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna I don't know if my previous posts arrived but I still prefer to think = that a "small" antenna is one plate of a capacitor and the rest of the = universe is the other. This then enables the spacecraft antenna to work. = The universe is not a great big empty space! 73 de Pat On 10/07/13 08:58, edgar wrote: I sent this message two days ago and I did not see it arrive. Although the subject is now out of context, I would like some = comment on my question. Regards, Edgar Moonah, Tasmania. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: LF: VK1OD's = analysis of the MiniWhip antenna=20 Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:06:50 +1000=20 From: edgar =20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Hi Pieter-Tjerk, If that is the case, and all the parts are at the same potential, how=20 does a space craft, radio controlled model aeroplane get their signals? Surely every conductor in the unit will have a difference in potential=20 due to being in a electromagnetic field. Even in the legs of the FET. Although the potential will be extremely = small. Surely it is only necessary to have a change of the Vgs voltage of the = FET. So the geometry of the antenna has to be made to allow this to occur. Regards, Edgar Moonah, Tasmania. --=20 73 de pat g4gvw es gd dx qth nr Felixstowe East Coast UK ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01CE7D44.14E1E600 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Pat
 
Don't believe they are 'loading up' the = spacecraft=20 itself against the universe ;~). Antennas take the form of monopoles = (spacecraft=20 is the 'groundplane'), dipoles, quad helix etc.
 
Jay W1VD  WD2XNS =20 WE2XGR/2 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 pat
Cc: edgar
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 = 5:51=20 AM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: LF: = VK1OD's=20 analysis of the MiniWhip antenna

I don't know if my previous posts arrived = but I=20 still prefer to think that a "small" antenna is one plate of a = capacitor and=20 the rest of the universe is the other. This then enables the = spacecraft=20 antenna to work. The universe is not a great big empty = space!

73 de=20 Pat



On 10/07/13 08:58, edgar wrote:

I sent this message two days ago = and I did=20 not see it arrive.

Although the subject is now out of = context, I=20 would like some comment on my question.

Regards, = Edgar
Moonah,=20 Tasmania.


-------- Original Message --------=20
Subject: Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:06:50 +1000
From: edgar <edgarjtwining@virginbroadband.com.au>=
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Hi Pieter-Tjerk,

If that is the case, and all the parts are at the same potential, how=20
does a space craft, radio controlled model aeroplane

get their signals?

Surely every conductor in the unit will have a difference in potential=20
due to being in a electromagnetic field.

Even in the legs of the FET. Although the potential will be extremely =
small.

Surely it is only necessary to have a change of the Vgs voltage of the =
FET.

So the geometry of the antenna has to be made to allow this to occur.

Regards, Edgar
Moonah, Tasmania.






--=20
73 de pat g4gvw
es gd dx
qth nr Felixstowe
East Coast UK
------=_NextPart_000_0018_01CE7D44.14E1E600--