Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5DA7B380000B6; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 11:47:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TANF2-0006QB-57 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 16:46:40 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TANF1-0006Q2-HO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 16:46:39 +0100 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TANEz-00052M-Jv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 16:46:38 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiAFAINnS1BcHYh7/2dsb2JhbABFgkuiPZZJgQiCGwUBAQUIAQEDSQIsAQEDBQIBAwQNBAEBCiUUAQQaBhYIBhMKAQICAQGIA7pMixODF4MfA41hmBmCZg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,391,1344207600"; d="scan'208,217";a="384078912" Received: from host-92-29-136-123.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.29.136.123]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 08 Sep 2012 16:46:36 +0100 Message-ID: <001b01cd8dd9$1f791120$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <50493001.4050202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <16BEB82EDFAD4E4FB0A34C8BABAA6AE1@AGB> <504A14AD.2070403@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <504B5FAC.9050208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 15:46:33 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan Is that for RECEIVE as well?? Too many stations on LF es MF have poor RX capabilities or asmetrical ears for CW QSO'S g3kev . ----- Original Message ----- From: Stefan Schäfer To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 3:09 PM Subject: Re: LF: S/N test on 477 between day and night time at 390 km. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.240 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 FSL_UA FSL_UA 0.0 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 1273381c241b4bc851b7e848e0897dc9 Subject: Re: LF: S/N test on 477 between day and night time at 390 km. Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0018_01CD8DD9.1F2CC5E0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d6016504b68981424 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01CD8DD9.1F2CC5E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan=20 Is that for RECEIVE as well?? Too many stations on LF es MF have poor RX capabilities or asmetrical = ears for CW QSO'S g3kev . ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 3:09 PM Subject: Re: LF: S/N test on 477 between day and night time at 390 km. Hello Andy,=20 Yes, i'll run it until sunday night. Thank you and good luck :-) BTW next year i want to run a 1/4 lambda vertical for 630m when beeing = in France. Hopefully the allocation is given to that time. All the best, 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 08.09.2012 16:55, schrieb Andr=E9 Guy=E9:=20 Hello Stefan, DK7FC. I am listening OP4 477 kHz. Your signal is good and stable now at = day light time. I hope you continue your transmission until late QTR to night. I = think it will be intersesting to see how the S/N change at sunset = between us at 390 km. Best 73. Andy. F6CNI ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01CD8DD9.1F2CC5E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan
Is that for RECEIVE as well??
Too many stations on LF es MF have poor RX = capabilities or=20 asmetrical ears for CW QSO'S
g3kev
.
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Stefan = Sch=E4fer
Sent: Saturday, September 08, = 2012 3:09=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: S/N test on = 477 between=20 day and night time at 390 km.

Hello Andy,

Yes, i'll run it until sunday=20 night.

Thank you and good luck :-)

BTW next year i want = to run a=20 1/4 lambda vertical for 630m when beeing in France. Hopefully the = allocation=20 is given to that time.

All the best, 73, = Stefan/DK7FC


Am=20 08.09.2012 16:55, schrieb Andr=E9 Guy=E9:=20
Hello Stefan, DK7FC.
 
I am listening OP4 477 kHz. Your signal is good and stable now = at=20 day light time.
 
I hope you continue your transmission until late QTR to night. = I think=20 it will be intersesting to see how the S/N change at sunset between = us at=20 390 km.
 
Best 73.
 
Andy. F6CNI
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_0018_01CD8DD9.1F2CC5E0--