Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 40E933800009E; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:58:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QwFpQ-0005q9-L0 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:57:20 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QwFpQ-0005q0-57 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:57:20 +0100 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QwFpN-0002fk-QQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:57:20 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AigBALIeVU5cHnUG/2dsb2JhbABClBYDhAVEjxR4gTsFAQEFCAEBA0kCExkBAQMFAgEDBA0EAQEKJRQBBBoGFggGEwoBAgIBAYdiArtLhkkEglGEYZVehwU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,275,1312153200"; d="scan'208,217";a="363177544" Received: from host-92-30-117-6.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.30.117.6]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 24 Aug 2011 16:57:09 +0100 Message-ID: <001b01cc6276$7aa1d170$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:57:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: LF: Re: WSPR or QRSS: which is better? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0018_01CC627E.DBFFAF70" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:459385088:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404c4e551f933f02 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01CC627E.DBFFAF70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Roger QRS is always better than wspr. Only one level of demodulation needed, = just read the dots/dashes as displayed on screen, whereas wspr and other = similar data modes need further demodulation, for example vy weak wspr = traces that do not demodulate could easily be read had it been on/off = keyed QRS mode. QRS is also a good real time QSO mode, next best thing to normal CW de mal/g3kev =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Roger Lapthorn=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 4:42 PM Subject: LF: WSPR or QRSS: which is better? A question for the coding experts here: WSPR is an excellent weak = signal beaconing mode, but at what QRSS speed is QRSS "better" ? 73s Roger G3XBM --=20 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01CC627E.DBFFAF70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Roger
QRS is always better than wspr. Only one level = of=20 demodulation needed, just read the dots/dashes as displayed on screen, = whereas=20 wspr and other similar data modes need further demodulation, for example = vy weak=20 wspr traces that do not demodulate could easily be read had it been = on/off=20 keyed QRS mode.
QRS is also a good real time QSO mode, next best = thing to=20 normal CW
 
de mal/g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Roger=20 Lapthorn
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, = 2011 4:42=20 PM
Subject: LF: WSPR or QRSS: = which is=20 better?

A question for the coding experts here: WSPR is an = excellent=20 weak signal beaconing mode, but at what QRSS speed is QRSS "better"=20 ?

73s
Roger G3XBM

--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/

------=_NextPart_000_0018_01CC627E.DBFFAF70--