Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 22A6238000097; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 14:04:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QvCMe-0003YC-TH for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 19:03:16 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QvCMe-0003Y2-D6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 19:03:16 +0100 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QvCMc-0006mp-8M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 19:03:16 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiABANdHUU5cF/CX/2dsb2JhbABBFohvjyxEjxx4gTsFAQEFCAEBA0kCLAEBAwUCAQMRBAEBCiUUAQQaBhYIBhMKAQICAQGHYgK1GoZIBIcxnFps X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,259,1312153200"; d="scan'208";a="352082237" Received: from host-92-23-240-151.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.240.151]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 21 Aug 2011 19:03:07 +0100 Message-ID: <001b01cc602c$88403ac0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <16BC8B3CA8672445BC2A29B4C14A26D4379ED2AAB4@exlnmb01.eur.nsroot.net> <4DF9EFD1.5010208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1313780109.51443.YahooMailNeo@web111907.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <9CD1E11E8BC9402CB4AECECAC4088443@JimPC> <00f801cc6004$c2282bd0$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <4E513642.9060403@freenet.de> <006601cc6024$05c22340$66a5fe04@ctrask> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 19:02:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:480617280:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60ce4e5148a01c19 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Look at it this way. An air wound coil by itself will induce a voltage into a radio receiver whereas a ferrite rod by itself will NOT, so the ferrite rod enhances the air wound coil. Is it a question of defination I am just trying to look at it logically, and in simplistic terms g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Trask" To: Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 6:01 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? > > > > Oh my god. > > > > > *Thus the ferrite rod has never been the 'antenna' energising the coil, > > > because it has always been the _antenna coil_ energising the ferrite > > > rod! * > > > > What a complete and utter pseudo-scientific nonsense. > > > > Just wait until you read the rest of his electromagnetic fantasies, such > as the part where he claims that there is no magnetic field in a propagating > EM wave. He's not the first one to create new EM theories because he fails > to understand the long-accepted ones. > > Chris Trask > N7ZWY / WDX3HLB > Senior Member IEEE > http://www.home.earthlink.net/~christrask/ > >