Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:19:20 +0100 Received: by ptb-mxcore16.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DkzW3-0004lp-Rc for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:19:20 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore16.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DkzW3-0004fE-NQ for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:19:19 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DkzUO-0006Ue-Ar for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:17:36 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DkzUN-0006UV-Qc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:17:35 +0100 Received: from olympus.pncl.co.uk ([195.224.180.233] helo=mailhost-av.pncl.co.uk) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1DkzUo-00012U-AO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:18:03 +0100 Received: from AUG2004 (81-6-246-72.dyn.gotadsl.co.uk [81.6.246.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailhost-av.pncl.co.uk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5M7HQnP023858 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:17:26 +0100 Message-ID: <001b01c576fa$70014480$2101a8c0@AUG2004> From: "Walter Blanchard" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <75.47bd14e9.2fe9e06d@aol.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:17:18 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-Pinnacle-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Pinnacle-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: blanch@pncl.co.uk Subject: LF: Re: LORAN Rugby testing again Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
 
Markus,
Yes, saw it myself this time. It only added about 4 dB amplitude in a 10 kHz bw and I couldn't see much difference in sidebands at 137 kHz.
Rugby and Lessay are very roughly the same distance from me.
You might have a look at relative amplitudes - I haven't got a working Loran-C rx at the moment.
Will have another look today.
Walter G3JKV.
----- Original Message -----
From: MarkusVester@aol.com
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 10:28 PM
Subject: LF: LORAN Rugby testing again

Dear Group,

a second LORAN-C transmission from Rugby (GRI 6731-Y, 27.3 ms delay) occured today between about 8:30 and 16:10 UT.

Sorry for the a posteriori reporting - I suppose real-time uploads of LORAN traces might be more useful, but the second computer used for monitoring on 100 kHz currently cannot be connected to the internet. The corresponding lines on the LF screengrabber (eg 135923.340 Hz, mostly from Sylt) did not show any significant change, but at a distance of 923 km not much effect would be expected here.

73 and best wishes

Markus, DF6NM