Message-ID: <001b01c45c86$2a8a5b60$244024d5@jeff>
From: "F6CWN" <f6cwn@tiscali.fr>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <167.3131809f.2e1074be@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:34:36 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: Re: CA  Broadcast TX, LF beacon?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

27./06/2004   2020z

Thank you John Davis for the informations.
The use of le LF band is not easy to compare...
We must  persevere.  :o)
73: Jeff


----- Original Message -----
From: <WarmSpgs@aol.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: CA Broadcast TX, LF beacon?


> In a message dated 6/27/04 2:28:44 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> w1tag@charter.net writes:
>
> > This is not a commercial broadcast station. It is a 1-watt DC input
station
> >  operating under Part 15 of the FCC rules. I believe it has only been
heard
> >  in its immediate area.
>
> That is correct.  European LW broadcast stations are almost never heard in
> California, and even the Experimental Service licensees on 166kHz don't
put much
> signal strength out there, so Ed Gelinas has a relatively signal-free
> environment for covering his neighborhood.  He has only operated it with
amplitude
> modulation so far, but is considering operating it as a conventional Morse
> beacon during his "non-broadcast" hours later this year.
>
> John Davis
>