Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13674 invoked from network); 21 May 2003 11:24:26 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 21 May 2003 11:24:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 13091 invoked from network); 21 May 2003 11:24:08 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 21 May 2003 11:24:08 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19IRhD-0003KI-FY for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 May 2003 12:23:47 +0100 Received: from [62.253.162.45] (helo=mta05-svc.ntlworld.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19IRgz-0003J6-98 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 May 2003 12:23:33 +0100 Received: from mike1 ([80.4.107.45]) by mta05-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with SMTP id <20030521112332.YQSI311.mta05-svc.ntlworld.com@mike1> for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 12:23:32 +0100 Message-ID: <001b01c31f8b$b2cb77e0$2602a8c0@WorkGroup> From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000901c31f79$a8c9b0c0$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2> Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 12:25:35 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: Re. No US Ham band -poohey Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.8 required=5.0tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCESversion=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false > I think it would be best to keep clear of top end of the band which might be > in use for local QRSS contacts,and also when looking for VA3LK I had strong > Loran interference on 137.7446. So I would suggest we continue to use the > old T/A slot below 136 and would prefer 135.922 since that freq is quiet > here and reasonably clear of SXV. > 73 Laurie. I also favour the low end of the band as Luxembourg effect QRM is bad at the HF end in the evenings. But if we use that frequency for receive, is the high end (eg 137.770kHz) OK for receiving Eu in the USA? Mike, G3XDV http://www.lf.thersgb.net ====================