Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5766 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2003 10:30:37 -0000 Received: from netmail01.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.219) by mailstore with SMTP; 2 Mar 2003 10:30:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 19653 invoked by uid 10001); 2 Mar 2003 10:30:37 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail01.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 2 Mar 2003 10:30:37 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.12) id 18pQft-00023H-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2003 10:26:29 +0000 Received: from [212.135.6.11] (helo=smarthost1.mail.uk.easynet.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18pQfo-000238-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2003 10:26:24 +0000 Received: from tnt-5-194.easynet.co.uk ([195.40.200.194] helo=erica) by smarthost1.mail.uk.easynet.net with smtp (Exim 4.10) id 18pQfm-0003GN-00; Sun, 02 Mar 2003 10:26:23 +0000 Message-ID: <001a01c2e0a6$b8aaf600$c2c828c3@erica> From: "g3ldo" To: "=?iso-8859-1?B?VuRpbvY=?=" Cc: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001001c2dc8e$d08a8180$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2> <3.0.6.32.20030302115624.00817bc0@pop.jippii.fi> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 10:29:36 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: Morning 1-2 March 2003 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0tests=REFERENCESversion=2.50 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Väinö Thanks for the capture - it wasn't me > This looks interesting but can not interprete > exactly what has been happening - and when, > the time axis (and freq) is not exactly correct. > The time lag of this system is abt 12-15 minutes. > I was out last night and didn't get back until around 0100z I checked the frequency range that you recorded. CT1DRP was on his usual frequency at ,773.5 There was another signal around .772.5 but I didn't get an ID I looked at it again at around 0500z but the keying had ceased and the frequency had developed an unstable downward drift, which looks like the signal in your capture. Could it have been RU6LA? Unfortunately, I forgot to set Argo to capture. Regards, Peter, G3LDO e-mail Web