Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12019 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2002 19:58:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 10 Apr 2002 19:58:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 22376 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2002 19:30:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 10 Apr 2002 19:30:18 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16vPBk-0003fF-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 21:59:32 +0100 Received: from mail.mcf.com ([165.254.158.18]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16vPBj-0003fA-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 21:59:31 +0100 Received: from parissn2 (193.252.108.181) by mail.mcf.com with ESMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 3.1.2d4) for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 15:21:25 -0400 Message-ID: <001a01c1e0c4$f29aaf00$0700000a@parissn2> From: "Stewart Nelson" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <123.edc5b81.29e5d215@aol.com> Subject: LF: Re: Phase meter for propagation experiment Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 21:21:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Wolf and all, With some additional programming, it should be possible to eliminate most or all of the special hardware. That might let you get a number of folks to participate in reception. One possibility is to use the LORAN sidebands already present in the received signal. They can calibrate both receiver LO and soundcard errors. Of course, if you are not close enough to the selected LORAN station for its groundwave to always be dominant, that might not provide an adequate reference for your needs. But that's also true if you use hardware based on MSF or DCF77, and you're not really close to them. I don't know how the TV broadcasters lock their sync, but if the signal is suitable, and the test signal is near the high end of the band, then just turn on the TV and the flyback's ninth harmonic of 15625 will be at 140.625 kHz. It may be somewhat out of the receiver's passband, but should be strong enough to be trackable. For calibrating the sample rate, use the field rate modulation inevitably present. If one has a GPS with a 1 PPS output, you can get really accurate results. Again, no special hardware is needed. Couple the 1 PPS directly into the Rx antenna input (along with the desired signal) and do the rest in software (G3PLX algorithm). 73, Stewart KK7KA ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 7:36 PM Subject: LF: Phase meter for propagation experiment > Dear LF group, > > I am planning an experiment based on an idea from Alan G3NYK. The idea is to > monitor the phase variation of strong signal on LF over day and nighttime. It > may be interesting to find out how much phase variation is there; how much > the propagation path length varies etc. > > At least two receiving sites are required: One close to the transmitter, and > another far away from it. On both ends very accurate phase meters must be > used. Of course, the phase of the transmitted signal must connected to an > atomic clock like MSF or DCF77. > > I think I found a possibility now how the required accuracy can be achieved, > here is the basic principle. Most is done by software, only a decent hardware > is required: > > - The RX stations have clock sources locked to GPS, MSF, DCF77 or TV sync > (15625 Hz) of certain broadcasters. > > - The reference clock (from the locked source) is divided down to a frequency > which can be handled with a standard soundcard. For reasons explained below, > an audio tone of 1...3kHz is required. Assume 60kHz/24=2.5 kHz, or > 77.5kHz/31=2.5kHz, or 15.625kHz/6=2.604166666kHz. This audio frequency must > be entered in the software's "sample rate calibrator". > > - The divided reference frequency (or the 15625 Hz signal) is used in the > software to PERMANENTLY monitor the soundcard's sample rate. This is > important because the sample rate may drift by a few millihertz which is > unacceptable here. > The software can already detect the sample rate from a very weak reference > signal, so it is enough to add a small fraction of the reference frequency to > the receiver's audio output because it is in another audio frequency band > (longwave RX: 100...2000 Hz, reference: 2.5kHz or 15625 Hz). So there is no > need for a stereo soundcard ! > > - The 2.5kHz reference is formed into a square wave like a 'frequency marker > generator'. Odd harmonics are the result. One harmonic must be in the > longwave receiver's passband, for example 55*2.5kHz = 137.5 kHz, or > 53*2.604166666kHz = 138.020833333kHz. A small fraction of this harmonic is > added to the antenna signal which goes into the receiver. We need this to > compensate the VFO drift of a "normal" shortwave- or longwave receiver via > software as explained below. > > - Assume your SW receiver runs in USB, the VFO tuned to 136 kHz. For the VFO > drift compensation (which is completely done in software), the received audio > should contain a weak 'audio peak' at 137.5-136= 1.50kHz, or 138.02083333-136 > = 2.02083333kHz. This audio frequency must be entered in the software's > "frequency offset calibrator". > > With this system of two "calibrators" (one for the PC's audio sample rate, > the other for the longwave receiver's slightly drifting VFO) it is possible > to make very accurate long-term phase measurements. > I have such a system running now, but not perfect yet, because my > DCF77-locked source sometimes unlocks for a few seconds which spoils > everything. I tried to convince my pocked GPS receiver to produce a > 1-pps-signal which could drive G4JNT's GPS locked source but no success. At > the present time I use the german ZDF TV broadcaster which has a precise > 15625 kHz signal. > > If someone likes to participate in this experiment, he may try to get the > last version of SpecLab running. The two 'calibrator' routines are > implemented but not explained in the manual yet, if there is interest in this > experiment I will continue development and tell you how to use it. Or offer > the calibration routines (written in C) to anyone who can program nice and > clean user interfaces... ;-) > > Regards, > Wolf DL4YHF. > > >