Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1124 invoked from network); 7 Jun 1999 08:46:34 +0100 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 7 Jun 1999 08:46:34 +0100 Received: (qmail 11184 invoked from network); 7 Jun 1999 07:51:01 -0000 Received: from punt.unica.co.uk (194.75.183.60) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 7 Jun 1999 07:51:01 -0000 Received: from troy.blacksheep.org ([194.75.183.50] ident=root) by punt.unica.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.00 #2) id 10qu65-0006dI-01; Mon, 7 Jun 1999 08:45:29 +0100 Received: (from root@localhost) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id HAA12729 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing; Mon, 7 Jun 1999 07:45:07 GMT Received: from post.thorcom.com (root@post.unica.co.uk [194.75.183.70]) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA12701 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 1999 07:44:52 GMT Received: from artemis.le.ac.uk ([143.210.16.126]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 2.04 #3) id 10quJr-0005E1-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 7 Jun 1999 08:59:43 +0100 Received: from pc171.geog.le.ac.uk ([143.210.151.171] helo=kate) by artemis.le.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 10qu52-0001uZ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 7 Jun 1999 08:44:24 +0100 Message-ID: <001901beb0b8$a947f950$ab97d28f@kate.geog.le.ac.uk> From: "Kate Moore" To: "lfgroup" Subject: LF: Noise update Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 08:37:57 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org First, a big thanks to Simon Lloyd-Hughes, G8AFN, G3XDV, G3RXH, G4FKK, G0MRF and G3YXM for encouragement, comments and ideas. All very useful stuff which is helping me to work on the noise problem, and proves the wonderful value of this reflector. I have been quite busy over the weekend, so haven't had much time to persue things, but here is an update of results so far. Unfortunately, the noise on our own BC RX is just below the level to cause any noticable interference to any of the main service broadcast signals (R4, R5 etc.) or the local BBC/IBA MW stations (whose antennas I can see from here). Virgin 1214 does have some noise on it, but is only intrusive during speech. Although it is detectable from below 70kHz to above 20MHz on the TS-850, it isn't as blanket 'wide-band' as I thought, and more careful tuning has revealed some noticable peaks and troughs. It is, however, difficult to detect a regular pattern, so I suspect these are due to resonances in wiring connected to the source. A very interesting observation is that I was previously tuning in far too narrow a bandwidth to properly analyse the signal characteristics. Through a CW or even SSB filter, the noise sounds a 'roaring' hash and spectrally seems random. However, when I switch to AM with 6KHz filters in, it becomes much more raspy, and feeding the audio into a 'scope reveals a sharp (but wobbly and ringing) pulse with a main repetition rate of 10mS superimposed with a pulse at 20mS - surprise, surprise 100Hz and 50Hz!! Looking in that mode/B-W using a spectrogram shows the following lines: 50Hz weak 100Hz very strong 150Hz strong 200Hz strong 250Hz fairly weak 300Hz fairly weak 400Hz fairly strong 500Hz fairly strong 600Hz fairly weak 700Hz and above at 100Hz intervals, weak This seems consistent with the 'wandering' nature of the PRF on the 'scope. I went out again with the Walkman, listening to a peak around 1340kHz, but still couldn't get a consistent fix on it. Walking around adjacent blocks, the strength and nulls vary in a confusing way, but it is certainly audible over a very wide area. What was especially interesting was that as I walked past the numerous telephone poles around here, the noise level increased significantly as I passed SOME of them. All the poles where the noise increased had a wire running down the pole into the ground, but NOT all the poles that had a drop-wire produced an increase in noise! Whether these are acting as radiators or merely 'receive antennas' I wouldn't like to say. The local digital exchange is actually on the corner of my block, but the noise didn't noticibly peak as I walked past it and the bearing I get from home is in the perpendicular direction!! I think this is going to be a tricky one to DF...... If anyone has any further ideas from the above, I'd be really pleased to hear from you. The noise was on continuously all weekend, so I have been QRT. John G4GVC near Leicester, IO92JP