Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com
Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp587522pad;
        Fri, 27 Sep 2013 18:27:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.181.12.75 with SMTP id eo11mr4869690wid.24.1380331627301;
        Fri, 27 Sep 2013 18:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ev17si378397wid.0.1969.12.31.16.00.00;
        Fri, 27 Sep 2013 18:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org;
       dkim=fail (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1VPizC-0005sx-Vu
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 02:06:18 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1VPizC-0005so-Gj
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 02:06:18 +0100
Received: from qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.32])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77)
	(envelope-from <jrusgrove@comcast.net>)
	id 1VPizA-000100-Mh
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 02:06:17 +0100
Received: from omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.87])
	by qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id WQw41m0011swQuc53R6E7p; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 01:06:14 +0000
Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9])
	by omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id WR6E1m00H0CFS1j3bR6ENX; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 01:06:14 +0000
Message-ID: <001801cebbe6$edceac60$6401a8c0@JAYDELL>
From: <jrusgrove@comcast.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 21:06:14 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net;
	s=q20121106; t=1380330374;
	bh=EWxSuWrIr++N7CCR0GdAxE8iG1CBYZ3vVJ8xEaS0CXI=;
	h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:
	 Content-Type;
	b=AKH/xJfYszL8KgKCHTSffUqZOG/iPDEJOt1drX3S+1Zyy/HtkOSw+mSfhOswMImfq
	 Jblcg4uwNZcNxl/18iEuHXADJGB+NZJ7HKFUhXgZ0O247hPZVord4n+KtotrUUio9p
	 Cl2FSaHmCV2XbtRBi/KOkmbYTEx5/bUSXCFqEuNyYg+4JemegnbStCTYw0Rx1648gj
	 WWo3hewz+WlQL9H+eqo3n7oduC5VHwGyyVCiYmKyc0scU82MY0rEYvC8AiHoujYI4P
	 NLbGgCjy4tO6/A5db6fe/S0XOd2Q80tLtSZ9Qa0mlk1m5MbMVxMwGqGFw/KPK1YGFI
	 9JR9zEQeCdk7A==
X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  Stefan Memory fuzzy here ... not sure if I've seen a -40 snr
    on your signal in the past. Do you recall? 2013-09-28 00:30 DK7FC 0.137610
    -40 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls 6099 295 [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (1.3 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
                             trust
                             [76.96.62.32 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE        STOX_REPLY_TYPE
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net)
  1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS          Subject is all capitals
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 -2.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD        Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
  1.9 STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
X-Scan-Signature: 7b4dbd93955117b98f3a6ac4d7602f88
Subject: LF: DK7FC WSPR15
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS,
	UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 401

Stefan

Memory fuzzy here ... not sure if I've seen a -40 snr on your signal in the past. Do you recall?

2013-09-28 00:30  DK7FC  0.137610  -40  0  JN49ik  1  W1VD  FN31ls  6099  295 

Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2 WG2XSR/2