Message-ID: <001801c4ecd2$2b6d7ee0$7d540150@captbrian>
From: "captbrian" <captbrian@ukonline.co.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <BDF3801B.46D5%mitch.powell@sympatico.ca> <009d01c4eaf4$38a9fa00$0500a8c0@charter.net> <02e901c4eaf7$9e0b9f40$0201a8c0@private.network> <002d01c4eb56$c53c6180$0500a8c0@charter.net> <001801c4eab9$b4d62940$c8e4fc3e@l8p8y6> <003601c4eb83$64d154e0$3e540150@captbrian> <000c01c4ecbc$a87a2340$7fccfc3e@l8p8y6>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 11:41:27 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: Trans Atlantic
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Absolutely. They need only send CQD or SOS.......but of course if they can't
send morse then .......???

Bryan
----- Original Message -----
From: hamilton mal <g3kev.ham@virgin.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Trans Atlantic


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "captbrian" <captbrian@ukonline.co.uk>
> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2004 7:45 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: Trans Atlantic
>
>
> > Regardless of appellations used in the licence, a station transmitting
for
> > pure amateur pleasure with no professional/commercial intent is by all
> > standards of English usage...
>
> Will you rush out to the RESCUE when they are all locked up !!
>
> >
> > an "amateur radio station"...[your honor, My Lord, Judge, Maitre,
ef.  )
> > etc.
> >
> > G3GVB
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: hamilton mal <g3kev.ham@virgin.net>
> > To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2004 7:40 PM
> > Subject: Re: LF: Trans Atlantic
> >
> >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "John Andrews" <w1tag@w1tag.com>
> > > To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> > > Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2004 2:10 PM
> > > Subject: Re: LF: Trans Atlantic
> > >
> > >
> > > > Scott,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the reminder from the VE side. I now remember an earlier
> > email
> > > > exchange on that subject. And I do agree with your caution in not
> > straying
> > > > from the purpose of the grant.
> > > >
> > > > I suppose the same argument could be made from elsewhere. Has anyone
> > > plumbed
> > > > the depths of U.K. officialdom on the subject of communicating with
> > > > non-Amateur services? Or is it best just to leave such things alone?
> > > >
> > > > The problem is actually not with making the 2-way contact; it is
with
> > the
> > > > resulting publicity! If such news were confined to a small group of
> > > > experimenters, nothing would probably come from it.
> > > >
> > > > John Andrews
> > >
> > > Hi John and Group
> > > My licence EI2AE says Experimenters Licence and not Radio Amateur
> Licence.
> > I
> > > expect all EI licences say the same.
> > > Maybe it has been changed to accommodate recripocal licensing
> arrangements
> > > with other countries that specify Radio Amateur Licence. The main
point
> > > being that anyone can interwork between EI and the rest of the world,
so
> > by
> > > the same logic I do not think there would be a problem in the UK
working
> > an
> > > experimental type station in the USA or elswhere.
> > > The problem might be at your end if it specifically states only inter
> PART
> > > 15 contacts.
> > > So you take a chance or you  dont!!!!!!!! If we were all closed down
> would
> > > it make that much difference!!
> > > de Mal/G3KEV
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>