Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16127 invoked from network); 15 May 2003 09:42:28 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 15 May 2003 09:42:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 19783 invoked by uid 10001); 15 May 2003 09:42:28 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 15 May 2003 09:42:28 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19GF8M-0001IA-Ak for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 May 2003 10:34:42 +0100 Received: from [194.73.73.176] (helo=protactinium.btinternet.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19GF85-0001Hq-OP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 May 2003 10:34:25 +0100 Received: from host213-122-153-224.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([213.122.153.224] helo=Main) by protactinium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #23) id 19GF83-0000KI-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 May 2003 10:34:23 +0100 Message-ID: <001801c31ac5$04d12240$6507a8c0@Main> From: "Alan Melia" To: "LF-Group" Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 10:32:32 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: re 137.0 last night Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0tests=noneversion=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi all, I guess this could be a bigger problem over the west side of the Pond. I saw an FSK signal appear weakly last night at about 2230z, but later when I decided to switch on the logger, I realised it seemed to have gone off. Then I saw that there was a wide hump of noise centred on 137 and assume they switched to GMSK. This has a wider band width than FSK and was showing at + / - 150Hz even over here. From my previous measurements it seems to give similar reading but one does need to get is all in the RX bandwidth. I hope the noise is not too wide on that side, and am sorry to see the FCC refusal after all this time. Cheers de Alan G3NYK alan.melia@btinternet.com