Return-Path: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>
Received: (qmail 1147 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2001 21:48:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225)  by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 9 Jan 2001 21:48:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 22825 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2001 21:43:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70)  by murphys with SMTP; 9 Jan 2001 21:43:03 -0000
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14G6R6-0005bn-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2001 21:36:08 +0000
Received: from fep02.swip.net ([130.244.199.130] helo=fep02-svc.swip.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14G6R5-0005bi-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2001 21:36:08 +0000
Received: from oemcomputer ([212.151.48.135]) by fep02-svc.swip.net          (InterMail vM.5.01.01.01 201-252-104) with SMTP          id <20010109213548.TQRX5424.fep02-svc.swip.net@oemcomputer>          for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>;          Tue, 9 Jan 2001 22:35:48 +0100
Message-ID: <001801c07a84$36f261a0$873097d4@oemcomputer>
From: "Johan Bodin" <sm6lkm.jbeab@swipnet.se>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: SV: Re: VE1ZZ "M" in Sweden (?)
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 22:36:23 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Mike 'XDV and All

Yes, it must have been VE1ZZ. I got even better copy on his 0100Z
transmission.

Regarding blurred dots:
Yes, I am well aware that the BW was (at least theoretically) too narrow
for Jack's speed.

I used Argo beta 113 and tried both 3s and 10s settings. I found that
that the 10s setting gave a better overall readability despite the
smearing.

It would certainly help if Jack slowed down to 10s/dot - but that requires
approx. 5dB higher patience level at the receiving end, hi..

73
Johan SM6LKM

>========
>I think I saw VE1ZZ on 135.502. With a little imagination,
>"1ZZ" can be seen in the attached picture. The transmission
>ended, or disappeared into QSB, at 00.42 UTC.
>73 de Johan SM6LKM
>===========
>
>Johan,
>
>It is certain that your spectrogram shows VE1ZZ but you have the averaging
>set too high (or the bandwidth too low) which is why the dots are blurred.
>
>Mike, G3XDV