Return-Path: Received: from rly-mg02.mx.aol.com (rly-mg02.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.108]) by air-mg10.mail.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMG101-9fd4796214e207; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:01:11 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mg02.mx.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMG027-9fd4796214e207; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:01:05 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1JHMUN-0006wv-TI for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:00:43 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1JHMUN-0006wk-7u for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:00:43 +0000 Received: from smtp802.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.62]) by relay2.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JHMUK-0006W0-0r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:00:43 +0000 Received: (qmail 62914 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2008 17:00:33 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=M/7S8PhhHN0vr3sEvrEQSNG3/qVC1YtlQ0GuJSiSiQiaqsiFN3jtatd+FjV+vPzMeUUIVKkVClDto7vGJrG29kv2mTB8lPHr+H/ukgWCcvMMd1WKTN47CG4gh07A4ct4ZVZDpDX22m6IIwtAeRbs542H80WvLrBGfmbHZd//qiM= ; Received: from unknown (HELO Lark) (alan.melia@btinternet.com@213.122.51.67 with login) by smtp802.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Jan 2008 17:00:33 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: 28sSmo4VM1lRgpcCfqHXJTqO6TbDILNwNd6DNMw2lN4JHSHPCcHGsYWA52qz48t_PEIaP9o5CQ-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <001601c85d18$4f9dd080$0900a8c0@Lark> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <20080122135712.5D7C8F3862@smtps02.kuleuven.be> <6fr2vh$9mks42@ip06.eastlink.ca> <20080122160550.9AC4C31E702@smtps01.kuleuven.be> <47961BC8.5050702@eastlink.ca> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:00:26 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.359 Subject: Re: LF: Fenceline longwire Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : n Hi Vernon this might tend to prove that the simulation is not modelling the travelling wave effect that gives the long low wire is directional preferences (??) Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vernon Matheson" To: Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 4:37 PM Subject: Re: LF: Fenceline longwire > Rick that is surprising as I find them very directional and that the 1000' on the whole > has worked better than the 2000' but that could just be propagation. The 1000' is N/S > and the 2000' is E/W. > > Anything heard on the N/S is usually nulled on the E/W and vice versa. > > Vern > >