Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18845 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2003 20:09:00 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 18 Apr 2003 20:09:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 7554 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2003 20:08:47 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 18 Apr 2003 20:08:47 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 196c6Y-0001FR-He for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 21:05:02 +0100 Received: from [62.253.164.47] (helo=mta7-svc.business.ntl.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 196c6T-0001FE-Jb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 21:04:57 +0100 Received: from ian ([62.252.208.242]) by mta7-svc.business.ntl.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20030418200455.YHHN27609.mta7-svc.business.ntl.com@ian> for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 21:04:55 +0100 Message-ID: <001601c305dd$95539520$f2d0fc3e@ian> From: "Ian Kyle" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000201c3058c$45093ee0$f9e4fc3e@l8p8y6> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 20:05:24 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: Mystery.....penultimate part Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=5.0tests=HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,REFERENCESversion=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Hi Mal,
 
Things are not complicated in the way you imply.. The earthing system is the kind of thing that us suburban non-agriculturists have to devise and put up with, and as I said in previous posting I have been so far been unable to persuade the thing to accept the 4/50 matching transformer or I wouldn't be fulminating on the reflector about it.
Now,  you keep telling me  yourself that my sigs are adequate, and M0BMU reckons that things are fairly respectable, so there is probably little real point in seeking those last few milliamps. I am not interested in being the biggest signal on the band or swelling Viridian (NIE) profits running big TXs, nor chasing DX. The challenge from the day I first heard about the possibility of an LF allocation back in 1994 or 5 and decided to go for the A licence to be able to get on 73, has always been to see what could be done from a 60ft x 40ft back garden with what was readily available and without getting  into QRO or 'cheque-book radio'  territory .  But there is a puzzle in what I have found,  like an itch you can't scratch, so I asked for ideas - scrapping what I have and starting again is not solving the problem and not, in my opinion, in the true spirit of amateur radio, self-training and experimentation.
I am not really all that interested in 136KHz except that  like Mike XDV , I can provide an 'ordinary' station for T/A tests and be on occasionally if any DX chaser is rabid for GI, and once 73KHz goes I will need a deal of persuading to carry on on LF. I have had to sacrifice all my VHF/UHF and satellite antennas to get enough space to put up the LF antenna, and there is still the challenge of  'single antenna'  moonbounce to try for before the deterioration in my physical condition makes antenna work too difficult.
Here endeth the Easter sermon.
 
73,
 
Ian GI8AYZ/MI0AYZ