Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19409 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2003 15:41:45 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 10 Apr 2003 15:41:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 13960 invoked by uid 10001); 10 Apr 2003 15:41:44 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 10 Apr 2003 15:41:43 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 193eAK-0002Bf-Qz for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:40:40 +0100 Received: from [62.253.164.44] (helo=mta4-svc.business.ntl.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 193eAG-0002BT-1P for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:40:36 +0100 Received: from l8p8y6 ([62.252.204.156]) by mta4-svc.business.ntl.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20030410154034.OZAL11888.mta4-svc.business.ntl.com@l8p8y6> for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:40:34 +0100 Message-ID: <001601c2ff6f$156fdae0$9cccfc3e@l8p8y6> From: "hamilton mal" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 15:30:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: CE Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGEversion=2.51 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.51 (1.174.2.5-2003-03-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

Hi all

On QRS mode CQ takes up a lot of non productive time. I am going to try instead CE which is unique and does not clash with any other bit of amateur procedure. ie CE G3KEV K

Those that see me using the above procedure on QRS mode will know that I am calling CQ and can respond accordingly.

If anyone has an opinion on the above for or against pse comment. On normal CW I wll continue with the established CQ.

73 de G3KEV/IO94SH