Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23791 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2002 09:44:25 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 27 Sep 2002 09:44:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 11603 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2002 09:44:36 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 27 Sep 2002 09:44:36 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 17ureC-00044T-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:42:56 +0100 Received: from [212.159.14.225] (helo=murphys.services.quay.plus.net) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 4.10) id 17ureC-000443-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:42:56 +0100 Received: (qmail 18780 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2002 09:42:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hugh) (62.60.61.131) by murphy.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 27 Sep 2002 09:42:23 -0000 Message-ID: <001601c26609$c8a831c0$0504210a@c.scope> From: "g6tmk" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <01C26537.C1466D20.g4jnt@thersgb.net> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:39:16 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: RE: Narrow CW filter using 32kHz clock crstals? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=5.0tests=SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK,FROM_NAME_NO_SPACESversion=2.31 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Hello Andy, In your recent posting about the 33kHz crystal filter, can you clarify what the characteristic impedance is ... It is very unusual to specify an impedance in terms of a frequency, so I feel there must be some mistake. Thanks Hugh M0WYE ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andy talbot" To: Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 8:36 AM Subject: LF: RE: Narrow CW filter using 32kHz clock crstals? > Its was I ........... > > 1) Take a handful of watch crystals, from the same batch (buy 10 or 20 from > Farnel / Maplin ??) > 2) Connect 5 in series to form the top elements of a ladder filter; you now > have 6 connection nodes, taking 1 as the input, 6 the output > 3) Connect shunt capacitors to ground as follows, from node 1 47pF, nodes > 2,3,4 and 5 82pF, and node 6 47pF. This gives a ladder filter with a > characteristic impedance of around 50kHz, a 3dB bandwidth in the region of > 2.2Hz and 10 dB loss. Centre frequency is 32765.5Hz - the series resonance of > a 32768Hz device cut for || resonance. The loss is high enough to smooth > out significant ripples so I made no serious attempt to get a decent response > shape - it was rounded - but with a lot of patience it could be improved no > doubt. > 4) All attempts to use the crystals in thier parallel mode, with top coupling > capacitors lead to very high losses that would have needed a characteristic > impedance of meg-ohms to get operational. > > I didn't think much of the xtal filter idea idea and abandoned it for a DSP > solution using the 56002EVM. > > Andy G4JNT > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tracey Gardner [SMTP:tracey.gardner@ntlworld.com] > Sent: 2002/09/25 18:49 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: LF: Narrow CW filter using 32kHz clock crstals? > > << File: ATT00001.txt; charset = Windows-1252 >> > > >