Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dj03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dj03.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.19.187.139]) by air-mf02.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMF024-8bd44caa4774124; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 17:30:28 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dj03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id BD1DD380000B6; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:30:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1P2sal-0001xB-Ak for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:29:03 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1P2sak-0001x2-Sc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:29:02 +0100 Received: from smtp824.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.9]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P2sai-0001MC-7Z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:29:02 +0100 Received: (qmail 54844 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 21:28:54 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=3hd4ajNn2B0u6tY75Xi1f+OARjUjOAsSXRFO3jSl9V63ji6pKUcPvLGHKTPeHYyWw4OA7le5qoQJom7R0JXQkUJOgGHgnsNxlminNQo4YUjNKn3QDKlZEswU7qqyQ9nq0W366oWKKbZ4gxhLEWWwJQBooEvWHi/TA2iHb8YPhzs= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1286227734; bh=oZwB4QrvBdR9u4lVveT/aNUddzoGosWnOBP8HXT7HWI=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=MI97uLgvR7fdMSwmgeJOrnXqPGJC6+Zml/XPlta4dfZcfQQYzKwvOi+5PBK0B3KWVmgmudfnkTrQ065mIIf2aIN9e84qPDCTX3mKtURcNwcqhPVB6ilSv0AcKhGden/x/+0Vm5kfUinP7co8Xc/XcIRvdRlItZd1GOnkSvRcUjc= Received: from lark (alan.melia@86.134.103.155 with login) by smtp824.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 04 Oct 2010 21:28:53 +0000 GMT X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- X-YMail-OSG: fvN9cd4VM1m5mnWF.r5xzjgXn8xXCSgZ7PlXkaCkAt6qtfY fi3fL2IoDvnalztIy62Vm5HEiRe8AtwcHb3gfQNhzNFd68ZmZhzXf_xCoKqk SFiAhv13iQAjFB91xslAFPmCsO_gJsc0eIgTAYx4exeKR0UizgBvfnqsm6cq 2VotL6o0qGV4MYZ_mnAh0XZ5CNhHgy6ef_EHF.35h5.FgIifWRabQ8jWUdya AMtuJIKpl1wZ13XmCjrVeOQAl0mYuGQhf0zQ5tbrNBLca6hvjxDc2m7jGit7 RUTWhEBxma42XohQ_QYcrub9lKEs0AuhI6Vc- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <001501cb640b$29e73ff0$4001a8c0@lark> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <4CA5E86D.1070208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <6F6098420211436FABB78BE04E5F8FAD@JimPC> <000901cb6215$2db60550$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4CA7096F.7070307@freenet.de> <4CA7C5EA.5060001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4CAA3CB4.5080600@toya.net.pl> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 22:18:20 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.2001 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.2001 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 101004-0, 04/10/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: Re: VLF: Re: DK7FC's 7th VLF kite experiment Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d247.2 ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039cdbc9d074caa47726bad X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Piotr, Nice to see your good work again. Do you think it would be possible to present the plot with a logarithmic distance scale. It mig= ht also be interesting to try dbuV/m for the strength axis??. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Piotr Mlynarski" To: Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 9:44 PM Subject: Re: VLF: Re: DK7FC's 7th VLF kite experiment Stefan Sch=E4fer pisze: > Wow! > Dear VLF, > This was very nice to read. So many messages and so many positive > receptions. I am really impressed! > > *Many thanks to you all* who have been active on this day, watching= on > 8,97 kHz, the Dreamers Band :-) > > *We have a new world record of the maximum distanced reception on VL= F > (by amateurs): SQ5BPF at a distance of 904 km with excellent S/N.* > Congratulations!! See attached picture. > > Thanks to Markus/DF6NM for QSP to the reflector. Sorry to Wolf/DL4YH= F > that i was not QRV on 2m CW but there were problems to that time (se= e > below). Thanks to SQ5BPF for the positive SMS ;-) Thanks to the US= and > canadian stations who tried to receive the signal. It becomes more= and > more probably since the S/N values are impressive here in EU. > > Congratulations to all successful receiving stations, especially the > new ones (on 8970 Hz) which are as far as i can see: Daniele Tincani= , > SQ5BPF, DD7PC, DF0WD, F1AFJ (683 km since my locator is/was JN49IS), > F5WK (very impressive S/N 25 dB at 460km distance!), DL3ZID(463 km)= :-) Dear Stefan, VLF , Congratulations to you for ,again, your remarkable efforts, passion, knowledge and skills resulting in another, world-wide acknowledged VLF experiment. Unfortunately, i was away from home by the time the experiments were taking place so i could only read e-mails with rx reports and remarks. I guess you recall some discussion about field strength ,propagation models etc.. among some "Dreamers" which took place, here, on this reflector, after your second/third vlf experiment. Paul Nicholson has introduced us to a paper dealing with some theoretical considerations about EM waves travelling in earth-ionosphere waveguide: http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/16973/53712465.pdf;jsess= ionid=3D995C2F2A8DC7FFC28D518D8FF1745D7C?sequence=3D1 I 've written fortran code based on egn. 5.2 of the above paper and i have already presented some theoretical estimates based on data taken from your previous experiments. Today, i present another theoretical E-field strength estimate( attachment) based upon your recent setup i.e with assumed antenna current of 1 Amp and its vertical length of 200 meters. The height of ionosphere has been assumed to vary between= 60 and 80 km f =3D 8970 Hz. A separate, 'single point' calculation has also been= made for the tx-rx distance of 904 km i.e. between you and Jacek,sq5bpf and the calculated effective field values for 60,70,80 km of ionosphere height are: 3.32; 2.85; 2.49 respectively (expressed in microVolts/m). 73, Piotr, sq7mpj p.s. in the course of collecting some literature dealing with propagation models of EM waves in the ELF_VLF_LF range; 'receivers' and 'antennae' i have found an interesting paper which title ( and contents) reads (= in our,radioamateur vocabulary) as simply another loop antenna and receiver for VLF reception :-) http://www-star.stanford.edu/~vlf/publications/2010-02.pdf ----------------------------------------------------------------------= ------ ----