From: "Gary - G4WGT" <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <006e01c9d0e4$d6af66b0$6401a8c0@asus> <5086F7980B3E4BB0AF60D8620D735B5E@JimPC> <4A067B34.9060701@btconnect.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 10:20:36 +0100
Message-ID: <001501c9d150$941e6aa0$6401a8c0@asus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A067B34.9060701@btconnect.com>
Thread-Index: AcnRPSm5B+xM6wbwR2mVpfg4/Z/U8QAEuEQg
Subject: RE: LF: Re: 503.600KHz Test
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Richard,

You wrote :- 
G4WGT was strong (599)

Thank you for my report & welcome to the 500KHz band.

Do you know about the UK500KHZ Group at :-

http://groups.google.com/group/uk500khz

73

Gary - G4WGT.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Richard Newstead
Sent: 10 May 2009 07:59
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Re: 503.600KHz Test

James Moritz wrote:
> Dear Gary, LF Group,
>
> You are S5 here at the moment in a the rising QRN. Also can see G0NBD 
> and OR7T attempting a QSO in MSK4 - Rik's signal is just about visible 
> on the waterfall, but will have to wait until I have completed 
> noise-cancelling improvements before I will stand a chance of copying 
> it here. G4JNT's beacon is also a good signal.
>
> Earlier, I had a CW QSO with G3XIZ, and this morning with Dennis, 
> M0JXM, who was a new one for me.
>
Jim

I heard you and G3XIZ well in IO83wg (both 559). G4WGT was strong (599) 
G0NBD was also strong (589). The Swedish beacon on 500 was 549.

73

Richard
G3CWI