Return-Path: Received: from rly-ma10.mx.aol.com (rly-ma10.mail.aol.com [172.20.116.54]) by air-ma10.mail.aol.com (v121_r2.11) with ESMTP id MAILINMA102-8d348a3e7f82ec; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 04:08:43 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-ma10.mx.aol.com (v121_r2.11) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMA105-8d348a3e7f82ec; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 04:08:26 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1KTXsF-0002ki-4k for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:07:59 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1KTXsE-0002kZ-Kf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:07:58 +0100 Received: from smtp-out-2.talktalk.net ([62.24.128.232] helo=smtp.talktalk.net) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KTXsB-0001Dx-85 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:07:58 +0100 X-Path: TTSMTP X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAAGFo0hOlLtm/2dsb2JhbACEPKsCA4ZYXgMCcg Received: from unknown (HELO mal769a60aa920) ([78.148.187.102]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP; 14 Aug 2008 09:07:49 +0100 Message-ID: <001501c8fde4$d85a0c50$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <003e01c8fd71$918b0cc0$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <8CACBA4268B3E87-238-DA7@FWM-M40.sysops.aol.com> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:07:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Karma: 0: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Activity 500 Khz Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : n I always thought an amateur radio licence was a transmitting licence, otherwise why bother, no licence is required to receive. G3KEV ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 10:39 PM Subject: Re: LF: Activity 500 Khz I'm sorry Mal, but just when did it become a given that experimentation required one to radiate a signal? My licence permits me to do many things but nowhere do I read an instruction to "transmit". Or perhaps you believe that I should only have an "old fashioned" artificial aerial permit? I'm getting rather fed up with this dialogue which hardly even qualifies as sensible debate. 73 de Pat g4gvw QTH Near FELIXSTOWE, UK Thought for today: What politicians do for science, hopefully science will do for them one day! -----Original Message----- From: mal hamilton To: rsgb Sent: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:22 Subject: LF: Activity 500 Khz Theere seems to be a lot of opinions and rheotric here on the reflector about LF and MF but I have never heard these stations actually transmitting on the bands, so I would guess they are not in a position to express an opinion. Surely I am not the only one capable of building and operating a CW station in the UK/EU on 136 and 500 khz. G3KEV ________________________________________________________________________ AOL Email goes Mobile! You can now read your AOL Emails whilst on the move. Sign up for a free AOL Email account with20unlimited storage today. No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.3/1610 - Release Date: 8/13/2008 4:14 PM