Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk
Delivery-date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:16:16 +0100
Received: by pih-mxcore17.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Dl6xc-0002yk-0d 
	  for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:16:16 +0100
Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20])
	  by pih-mxcore17.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Dl6xb-0002yV-Q5 
	  for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:16:15 +0100
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1Dl6wv-0007WP-RW
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:15:33 +0100
Received: from [82.108.183.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1Dl6wv-0007WG-1a
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:15:33 +0100
Received: from fh1023.dia.cp.net ([64.97.168.33] helo=n066.sc1.cp.net)
	by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1Dl6ws-0004Lj-UA
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:15:32 +0100
Received: from l8p8y6 (62.252.208.213) by n066.sc1.cp.net (7.0.043)
        id 42A5E14600514E0C for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:15:28 +0000
Message-ID: <001501c57734$fe51b6e0$d5d0fc3e@l8p8y6>
From: "hamilton mal" <g3kev.ham@virgin.net>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <001401c575b2$662ed1a0$39e4fc3e@l8p8y6> <944426188.20050620195733@mTerrier.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:08:12 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Subject: Re: LF: Fw: TM0AST
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00)


----- Original Message -----
From: "Michel F5WK" <f5wk@mTerrier.net >
To: "hamilton mal" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Fw: TM0AST


> Le lundi 20 juin 2005 à 18:08:34, g3kev.ham@virgin.net a écrit:
>
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From:hamilton mal
> > To:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 8:08 PM
> > Subject: TM0AST
>
>
>
> > Hi All
> > The callsign that I read was TM0AST and not TM5AST.  Which is correct ??
> > de G3KEV
> >
>
>  In the hurry, I forgot to check out the call sign in the QRS buffer. The
>  good callsign is TM5AST. It's been corrected just after the beginning of
>  the qso with Jim. Sorry about that.
>
>
>  73 de Michel f5wk
> --
> The Bat 3.0.1.33
Tnx Michel for the info. It looks like I am the only one that read the
callsign as sent. There is too much guesswork on LF and some claiming QSO'S
in the past because they saw a mark on the frequency but got no proper ID.
You were a very strong signal with me on both my loop and vertical. I did
not have time for a QSO but maybe next time.
73 de Mal/G3KEV


>