Return-Path: Received: (qmail 68721 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2004 08:16:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 16 Sep 2004 08:16:04 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1C7rZM-000Mfu-Fk for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:24:44 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1C7rZM-000Mfr-Cw for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:24:44 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1C7rQy-0005jg-BE for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 08:16:04 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1C7rQR-0006fL-F4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:15:31 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1C7rQR-0006fC-3Z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:15:31 +0100 Received: from ptb-relay02.plus.net ([212.159.14.213]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1C7rQN-0006Vs-Ft for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:15:31 +0100 Received: from [212.159.90.113] (helo=Hugh) by ptb-relay02.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1C7rQG-000MFb-Gz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 08:15:20 +0000 Message-ID: <001501c49bc4$56bb0950$0a03210a@Hugh> From: "Hugh M0WYE" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001c01c49b55$09f086a0$6507a8c0@Main> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:07:30 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 212.159.14.213 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of thersgb.net X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no, Subject: LF: Re: LF Components Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Alan said: > > 38-2670 Ferrite rod 20mm diam by 150mm long, this is really a "bulked up" > aerial rod !! I dont know what they are for but there are 6 slots along > the > length...could it be to reduce eddy currents ?? I dont think they are > intended for a winding. I haven't looked at the permiability yet, but I > guess they might be better than using a "bundle" of smaller rods, as I do > in > a 35mm diam solenoid. One thought is that it would be easy to trap a drive > cord in them for a permiability tuned inductor. > MMG-Neosid, describe these rods "fluted", although they don't do them as large in diameter as 20mm. They are sold as "Antenna Rods", but no explanation is given in the catalogue for the flutes. When I tried using ferrite rods at high power, i.e. TX not RX, I found that the ferrite heated up directly under the windings, the flutes might help reduce this. 73 Hugh M0WYE