Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9387 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2004 00:09:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan03.plus.net) (212.159.14.237) by ptb-mailstore03.plus.net with SMTP; 6 Jul 2004 00:09:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 1716 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2004 00:09:33 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore03.plus.net (212.159.14.217) by ptb-mxscan03.plus.net with SMTP; 6 Jul 2004 00:09:26 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BhdWY-000PJL-Bd for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 01:09:26 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BhdVv-0000wP-7T for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 01:08:47 +0100 Received: from [213.232.95.59] (helo=relay.salmark.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BhdVu-0000wG-QC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 01:08:46 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: stress.telefonica.net Received: from stress.telefonica.net ([213.4.129.135] helo=tnetsmtp1.mail.isp) by relay.salmark.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Bhk62-0005zV-2x for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 08:10:30 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: UserADSL Received: from UserADSL ([81.35.162.122]) by tnetsmtp1.mail.isp (terra.es) with ESMTP id I0EFML00.Y8O for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 23:56:45 +0200 X-Bad-Message-ID: no DNS (UserADSL) Message-ID: <001501c462da$dfc77580$2101a8c0@UserADSL> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Manuel?= To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <40E9C2A2.4020804@usa.net> <000d01c462d4$edc33a80$045bfea9@RSGB613192> Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 23:56:02 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no, Subject: LF: Re: Re: Web site Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 2 I agree with Andy, Alberto..... 73 de José, EA1PX ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andy Talbot" To: Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 11:13 PM Subject: LF: Re: Web site > The new one (...i2phd.com) is quicker. > > Andy G4JNT > > > --- Original Message ----- > From: "Alberto di Bene" > To: "LF Mailing List" ; > Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 10:05 PM > Subject: LF: Web site > > > > Could you please all of you do me a favour ? > > As you may know, my Web site http://www.weaksignals.com > > is physically hosted by qsl.net, which more often than not is abysmally > > slow. > > > > So I found a new host here in Italy, which looks much faster, at least > > to me. > > But I am fearing this my impression is distorted by the fact that between > > me and that host there are only a few hops. > > Could you please check whether from the rest of Europe and better yet > > from the US the speed of this host is significantly better than that of > > qsl.net ? > > > > Just point your browser to http://weaksignals.i2phd.com > > and compare the speed to that of http://www.weaksignals.com > > Depending on your reports I will or will not make the switchover, thanks. > > > > 73 Alberto I2PHD > > > > > > > > >