DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=btinternet.com;
  h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status;
  b=3xnfo7/WKndmrQ77mxSFvrLYEHlu/715v/6nLNgdXxM6B5PT1B4mmqQ7GVyFEUvfzJoLW1dcOzp3wYsRYTo1HaeCc+8EG7JfjzyKpSQaOmr0ag+nAlHC1J7SwRYZt9xCnHR1R94hdqNOlpnBTXtEZbORBlSsm72vu3dYxhTQog8=  ;
Message-ID: <001401cb1645$ce9e81c0$4001a8c0@lark>
From: "Alan Melia" <alan.melia@btinternet.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <6D39CC1F4253463CB8570333737E59AA@PCCasa> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C1D@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <B7FBFD72427D4802BC38C7310FB750A8@PCCasa> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C2E@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <8585FA1C733D9A42AEA98C724D8FB811C053AA@FBCMST18V01.fbc.local> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C30@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <48711884B26B40129A1D43EBB493A6BF@PCCasa> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C69@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 23:03:57 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
Subject: LF: Re: AW: Problems with RSGB LF reflector
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


I am not the list-owner but I often pick up these queries on his behal=
f. We
have had this problem before and it is nothing to do with the RSGB lis=
t. The
problem lies in aggressive spam blocking of one of the intermediate no=
des or
even the blacksheep service provider. I am afraid in the past we have=
 had
little success clearing this problem. I suggest Daniele starts with hi=
s own
service provider and askeds them why they are not able to deliver. Cer=
tain
addresses have been tagged as transporters of significant volumes of=
 spam
and many of these are now blacklisted out of hand. It is an easy solut=
ion
for the ISP. If you (Daniele) had been having trouble with the blacksh=
eep
system you would not have had a fail message........blacksheep just du=
mps
messages it doesnt like and does not send responses to avoid the "ping=
-pong"
effect. If Daniele has another mail address I suggest he tried that to=
 see
if that will get through. He will not be able to unsubscribe his alice=
.it
address from any other address, and it may mean he will get two copies=
 of
every posting. If he genuinely wants to unsubscribe an address he shou=
ld
amil me directly and I will passon a reqyest for the owner to do it.

Sorry for the problems
Alan G3NYK



----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer" <schaefer@hst.tu-darmstadt.de>
To: "Daniele Tincani" <daniele.tincani@alice.it>
Cc: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 8:04 PM
Subject: LF: AW: Problems with RSGB LF reflector


Dear LF administrators,

Daniele sent me this mail since he has problems (see below). Could any=
body
from the administrators help him? I think i do not have the authority=
 to
unsubscribe him ;-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC

________________________________

Von: Daniele Tincani [mailto:daniele.tincani@alice.it]
Gesendet: So 27.06.2010 10:57
An: Stefan Sch=E4fer
Betreff: Problems with RSGB LF reflector


Hello Stefan,

my apologies for bothering you with this issue.
Currently I'm not able anymore to send messages to the RSGB LF reflect=
or.
I always get errors from my e-mail provider saying that "the recipient=
's
destination email system is unknown or invalid".
For the same reason I cannot unsubscribe neither I can try to re-subsc=
ribe.
Could you kindly try to unsubscribe daniele.tincani@alice.it
<mailto:daniele.tincani@alice.it>  on my behalf?
Then I would try to subscribe from a different address.

Many thanks
Daniele