Message-ID: <001401bfa6ac$769c3e40$3b29f7c2@oemcomputer>
From: "John Rabson" <word.factory@zetnet.co.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <000301bfa66c$c2b0aae0$b0be01d5@default>
Subject: LF: Re: Puckeridge Beacon
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 08:30:15 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Also S3 here on a 17 turn 80 cm loop designed for cave radio on 88 kHz and
not retuned.

Many thanks gentlemen for all your efforts.

73 de
John Rabson G3PAI

----- Original Message -----
From: Alan Melia <Alan.Melia@btinternet.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2000 12:53 AM
Subject: LF: Puckeridge Beacon


> Hi All, for what it is worth I can copy a recognisable pattern from the
> beacon transmission with 90dB of attenuation inserted in front of the
> receiver. I am using the usual parameters for 3sec dot QRS (500msec time
> scale and averaging of 5) The signal at this level is equivalent to 5nV at
> the input of the RX, but it is not characteristic of what reception would
be
> like at distance, as I have attenuated the band noise as well!! The object
> was to see if the transmission pattern would be recognisable at threashold
> levels.....I guess it is.
> You are doing a great job fellas
> Cheers de Alan G3NYK
> Alan.Melia@btinternet.com
>
>
>
>