Return-Path: Received: from rly-mg08.mx.aol.com (rly-mg08.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.114]) by air-mg02.mail.aol.com (v121_r2.11) with ESMTP id MAILINMG021-a2e48aaa0ed132; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 06:31:22 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mg08.mx.aol.com (v121_r2.11) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMG088-a2e48aaa0ed132; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 06:31:12 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1KVOU3-0006uj-4P for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:30:39 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1KVOU2-0006ua-MG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:30:38 +0100 Received: from outmailhost.telefonica.net ([213.4.149.242] helo=ctsmtpout3.frontal.correo) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KVOTy-0005YE-NS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:30:38 +0100 Received: from PC2 (88.24.215.111) by ctsmtpout3.frontal.correo (7.3.135) (authenticated as JPRADOES$telefonica.net) id 489F908400547BC2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:30:24 +0200 Message-ID: <001301c901e6$917c2d30$2201a8c0@PC2> From: "Jose Manuel" To: References: <281222.921.qm@web26004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:30:14 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Karma: -1000: uceprotect.blacklist: if-match(0) => return-bad(1.0) X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY=0.126 Subject: LF: Re: NAVTEX interference Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0010_01C901F7.547392A0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : ? ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C901F7.547392A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mike and All, Perhaps you can contact with the MCA ( Maritime and Coastguard Agency); you= can see here some phone numbers: http://www.mcga.gov.uk/c4mca/mcga07-home/a= boutus/contact07/mcga-atoz.htm Good luck.....Jos=C3=A9, EA1PX ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Mike Thayne=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 11:50 AM Subject: LF: NAVTEX interference Hello All My QTH is 1 km from Cullercoats and with the 0900 transmission unbel= ievable splatter occurred at least +/- 100khz. This is not normal and was no= t caused by overload of my receiver. Normally I can continue to read weak si= gnals on 500 (when any are present!) at any time whilst GCC is sending Navte= x, it is not normally any problem for me. Maybe somebody knows who to approach to get the problem looked into. Best regards Mike, G3GMS Original message from Jose EA1PX Hello Gary and Group, I think that the interference is produced by the NAVTEX TX located i= n Cullercoats, with transmission times at 0100 0500 0900 1300 1700 and 2100=20= UTC. 73 de Jos=C3=A9, EA1PX Hello Gary and Group, I think that the interference is produced by the NAVTEX TX located i= n Cullercoats, with transmission times at 0100 0500 0900 1300 1700 and 2100=20= UTC. 73 de Jos=C3=A9, EA1PX=20 Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com= =20 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------= -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG.=20 Version: 7.5.526 / Virus Database: 270.6.5/1619 - Release Date: 18/08/2008= 17:39 ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C901F7.547392A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi  Mike and All,
 
Perhaps  you can contact with the MCA=20= (=20 Maritime and Coastguard Agency); you can see here some phone numbers: http://www.mcga.gov.uk/c4mca/mcga07-home/aboutus/contact07/mcga-atoz.ht= m
 
 
Good luck.....Jos=C3=A9, EA1PX
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Mike Thayne= =20
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 11:5= 0=20 AM
Subject: LF: NAVTEX interference

Hello All
 
My QTH is 1 km from Cullercoats and with the 0900 transmis= sion=20 unbelievable splatter occurred at least +/- 100khz. This is not norm= al=20 and was not caused by overload of my receiver. Normally I can contin= ue=20 to read weak signals on 500 (when any are present!) at any time whil= st=20 GCC is sending Navtex, it is not normally any problem for me.
 
Maybe somebody knows who to approach to get the problem looked=20 into.
 
Best regards
 
Mike, G3GMS
 
Original message from Jose EA1PX
 
Hello Gary and Group,
 
I think that the interference is pr= oduced=20 by the NAVTEX TX located in Cullercoats, with transmission times at=20= 0100=20 0500 0900 1300 1700 and 2100 UTC.
 
 
73 de Jos=C3=A9, EA1PX
=
 
 
Hello Gary and Group,
 
I think that the interference is pr= oduced=20 by the NAVTEX TX located in Cullercoats, with transmission times at=20= 0100=20 0500 0900 1300 1700 and 2100 UTC.
 
 
73 de Jos=C3=A9,=20 EA1PX

Send instant messages to y= our=20 online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com=20

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.=20
Version: 7.5.526 / Virus Database: 270.6.5/1619 - Release Date: 18/08/= 2008=20 17:39
------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C901F7.547392A0--