Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk
Delivery-date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:10:54 +0000
Received: by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F4ljB-0005TK-EI 
	  for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:10:54 +0000
Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20])
	  by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F4ljB-0005Qd-AI 
	  for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:10:53 +0000
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1F4lig-0006k7-Fo
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:10:22 +0000
Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1F4lig-0006jy-4Y
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:10:22 +0000
Received: from post-25.mail.nl.demon.net ([194.159.73.195])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1F4n2l-0004fU-UB
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 22:35:28 +0000
Received: from ndb.demon.nl ([82.161.81.65]:12524 helo=pcroelof)
	by post-25.mail.nl.demon.net with smtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1F4lhC-000Clk-A2
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:08:50 +0000
Message-ID: <001201c6283c$da3c1fc0$2201a8c0@pcroelof>
From: "Roelof Bakker" <roelof@ndb.demon.nl>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <000201c627fa$e6299570$e6a4c593@RD40002> <001b01c62802$9941a6a0$6901a8c0@AIRPORTTERMINAL> <000501c62816$793c8a00$2201a8c0@pcroelof> <001201c62828$19345220$66e8fc3e@l8p8y6>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 22:08:44 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: J310 IMD figures
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00)

Hello Mal,

Thank you for your kind offer. However I have already run an extensive 
series of tests in the countryside with a battery operated SLM. The outcome 
is that more height gives ( much) more signal, but unless the antenna is 
shielded by nearby bushes, the signal to noise ratio does not change. So 
nothing is gained with added height.

Best regards,

Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt