Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk
Delivery-date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:41:29 +0000
Received: by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F4jOZ-00022f-Oi 
	  for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:41:29 +0000
Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20])
	  by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F4jOZ-00021x-Ei 
	  for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:41:27 +0000
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1F4jOO-0005z9-Db
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:41:16 +0000
Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1F4jOO-0005z0-0p
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:41:16 +0000
Received: from smtpout0138.sc1.cp.net ([64.97.136.138] helo=n064.sc1.cp.net)
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1F4kiS-0002tV-8n
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:06:19 +0000
Received: from l8p8y6 (62.252.232.102) by n064.sc1.cp.net (7.2.069.1)
        id 43C54F51002783B0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:40:18 +0000
Message-ID: <001201c62828$19345220$66e8fc3e@l8p8y6>
From: "hamilton mal" <g3kev.ham@virgin.net>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <000201c627fa$e6299570$e6a4c593@RD40002> <001b01c62802$9941a6a0$6901a8c0@AIRPORTTERMINAL> <000501c62816$793c8a00$2201a8c0@pcroelof>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:36:15 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: J310 IMD figures
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00)


----- Original Message -----
From: "Roelof Bakker" <roelof@ndb.demon.nl>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 4:34 PM
Subject: LF: Re: Re: RE: Re: J310 IMD figures


> Hello Jay, Jim, LF-group,
>
> I used the same measurement setup.
> The buffer amplifier of the mini-whip has a loss of 4 dB.
> This has of course implications for the input intercept points.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt
Hi Roelof
Your antenna sounds interesting and could be useful under certain
environmential condx , urban areas with lots of noise but in my case it
would be hard to beat my vertical out in the countryside, however if you
send me one of these antennas I will try it out at various heights and let
you know the results.
73 de Mal/G3KEV

>
>