Return-Path: Received: (qmail 78276 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2005 14:00:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore03.plus.net with SMTP; 22 Mar 2005 14:00:59 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DDk0r-0007Rd-2F for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:05:41 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DDk0r-0007Ra-0A for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:05:41 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1DDjwJ-000Hzj-Ko for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:00:59 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DDjvh-0005cJ-Ka for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:00:21 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DDjvh-0005cA-89 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:00:21 +0000 Received: from fh1025.dia.cp.net ([64.97.168.35] helo=n082.sc1.cp.net) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDjvf-0005Sr-PA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:00:21 +0000 Received: from l8p8y6 (62.252.208.146) by n082.sc1.cp.net (7.0.038) id 420C44570048D2FA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:00:03 +0000 Message-ID: <001201c52ee7$875efec0$92d0fc3e@l8p8y6> From: "hamilton mal" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <002601c526f8$5d392c20$6401a8c0@JAYTERMINAL> <8152240259.20050312173711@pyrotherm.co.yu> <001b01c52e1c$414db1e0$25d1fc3e@l8p8y6> <36186466604.20050321210559@pyrotherm.co.yu> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:00:05 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 64.97.168.35 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of virgin.net X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: Re: Re[2]: LF: TA MAR 11/12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) ----- Original Message ----- From: "YU7AR" To: "hamilton mal" Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 8:05 PM Subject: Re[2]: LF: TA MAR 11/12 > Hi Mal, > > yes fackt is, mi RX and TX sistem is disproportional, now I test new > K9AY two turns loop for RX. Tnx info Teo. I live at a quiet QTH and so noise is not a problem either on the Vertical or Loop but the loop has a better signal over noise in the E/W direction. In the N/S direction the signals are in a null and poor reception. My loop is 80 metres perimiter vertical and if you have space put up as big a loop as possible and resonate it for 137 khz band. Your vertical should also be good if your QTH is noise free from Industrial noise etc. It depends on your circumstances as regards environmental noise whether you will be able to hear CW signals. The big problem for most on LF is noise and they cannot receive properly. We have worked before on CW but your signals is very loud here and hopefully we can work again. 73 and gl de Mal/G3KEV > >