Return-Path: Received: (qmail 83652 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2004 23:52:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan02.plus.net) (212.159.14.236) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 10 Jun 2004 23:52:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 62544 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2004 23:52:06 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore02.plus.net (212.159.14.216) by ptb-mxscan02.plus.net with SMTP; 10 Jun 2004 23:51:57 -0000 Received: from pih-mxlast01.plus.net ([212.159.6.17]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BYQyd-000JS0-Vg for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 14:56:24 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxlast01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BYLZM-0000ny-2J for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:09:56 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BYLWz-0000ZE-Li for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:07:29 +0100 Received: from [213.232.95.59] (helo=relay.salmark.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BYLWy-0000Z5-Pd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:07:28 +0100 Received: from grunt14.ihug.co.nz ([203.109.254.61]) by relay.salmark.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BYS5U-0005kt-20 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 17:07:32 +0100 Received: from 203-118-165-199.adsl.ihug.co.nz (athlon) [203.118.165.199] by grunt14.ihug.co.nz with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BYLWj-0004TP-00; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:07:13 +1200 X-Bad-Message-ID: no DNS (athlon) Message-ID: <001201c44eca$35af7cb0$6a00a8c0@athlon> From: "Dave Brown" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5.2.0.9.2.20040519074411.01fa5ab8@pop.vianw.pt> <000501c44dfb$bdf38640$7a1686d4@erica> <000b01c44e12$4a02eca0$6507a8c0@Main> <001b01c44ec9$0bd64000$edc828c3@erica> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:06:25 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no, Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: Off Topic---QRM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 2 Basic rate ISDN lines usually have a locally powered (ac mains wall wart etc) NT at the customer premises-if the power goes off this will stop 'talking' to the exchange end-which it is normally doing on a continual basis-even if no calls are established. Pair gain systems (0+2, etc), on the other hand- usually are powered from the exchange end, and would keep running despite local power being off. The former would be unusual in a suburban environment- the latter may be quite common. Whether or not this info is relevant is another matter! 73 Dave, ZL3FJ ----- Original Message ----- From: "g3ldo" To: Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 8:57 PM Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Off Topic---QRM > > Alan Melia said > > > > Hi Peter, the immediate thought is DSL ( or ADSL) or even ISDN lines. I > > would not lay too much store by BT "engineers" not being able to find it. > > These guys have little or no RF experience in general. Because it is so > > wirespread, I would suggest it is a system effect rather than a fault > > somewhere, and it would seem to correlate with the increased penetration > of > > "broadband". This could explain why some "diss poles" are not as noisy as > > others. > > Many thanks to Alan and the rest of you who responded regarding my QRM > problem. > > I don't think that the noise is generated by BT even though it is being > radiated by some of their distribution systems. > Last week we had a power cut that affected an area of around one or more km > radius and the noise (almost) disappeared. I think most ISDN etc is powered > from the exchange. > All the interference comes down the antenna. I can reduce it considerably by > parking my beam so that the deepest null is on the source of the noise. The > noise is very broadband (I can hear traces of it on the 10 and 18MHz band) > and is average S7 throughout the 14MHz so not an apparent harmonic. > > Peter, G3LDO > > >