Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20121 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2003 23:07:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO netmail00.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.218) by mailstore with SMTP; 25 Sep 2003 23:07:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 7606 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2003 23:07:42 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail00.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 25 Sep 2003 23:07:38 -0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1A2fBX-0003e0-GJ for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:06:07 +0100 Received: from [195.92.193.211] (helo=cmailm4.svr.pol.co.uk) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1A2fBT-0003dr-Iw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:06:03 +0100 Received: from modem-126.anguirel.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.114.254] helo=f3a3a2) by cmailm4.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.14) id 1A2fBS-0005uI-J0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:06:03 +0100 X-Bad-Message-ID: no DNS (f3a3a2) Message-ID: <001201c383ba$6ea88740$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2> From: "Laurie Mayhead" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001301c3833b$d8370760$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2> <000801c3836c$85a9a4e0$a2c828c3@erica> <001e01c38371$b3408900$09dc9384@jka> Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:11:27 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0tests=ORIGINAL_MESSAGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCESversion=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Rating: 2 ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Andrews" To: Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 3:31 PM Subject: LF: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon > Laurie, > > No offense intended, but other than the correctness of the frequency, is > there anything in that shot that identifies XDW? > > John Andrews > > Hi John, I absolutely agree! but thought it worthwhile to show it, since I have not seen anything so close to that frequency before. I will continue to monitor ,and who knows. 73 all, Laurie. > >