Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3321C380000AB; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:50:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T6idb-0004sL-7R for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:48:55 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T6ida-0004sC-Jd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:48:54 +0100 Received: from qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.24]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T6idY-00054V-MC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:48:53 +0100 Received: from omta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.11]) by qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id sbEh1j0020EZKEL51dotJm; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:48:53 +0000 Received: from DELL4 ([71.234.119.9]) by omta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id sdp61j01W0CFS1j3Mdp7pL; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:49:07 +0000 Message-ID: <001101cd85ed$04b449c0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> From: To: References: <503D5BDD.1030501@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <503D7BA9.7030404@charter.net> <503D7A4D.3030802@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <503DF6D9.40003@charter.net> <503E00F4.50300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:48:48 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan Good thing John was watching ... cat apparently spun the tuning dial and I didn't notice until morning. Cool nights now so the cats like to sleep on the warm receiver. Will engage dial brake next time ;~) [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.62.24 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D X-Scan-Signature: 1e15d6d6179985f133b43d42d658878a Subject: Re: LF: OP8 T/A? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604b503e1e0856d0 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan Good thing John was watching ... cat apparently spun the tuning dial and I didn't notice until morning. Cool nights now so the cats like to sleep on the warm receiver. Will engage dial brake next time ;~) Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 7:45 AM Subject: Re: LF: OP8 T/A? Hello John , OH! Good work, congrats to your receive equpiment! That is amazing. In the first moment i thought there were no decodes in our test because no red lines are shown in the pskmap. But later i found them in the text. Many thanks for the test. It's nice to detect that peak of best propagation, in 8 minute intervals. In a spectrogram it would work as well of course... So i still don't know if Jay got some results too? A summary of detections showing up here is attached (all T/A and the highest S/N of the others) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 29.08.2012 13:02, schrieb John Andrews: > Stephan, > > Well, I had four "hits" last night: > > 02:44 136 DK7FC de WD2XES Op8 3714 mi -30 dB in Holden, MA USA > 02:36 136 DK7FC de WD2XES Op8 3714 mi -29 dB in Holden, MA USA > 02:28 136 DK7FC de WD2XES Op8 3714 mi -29 dB in Holden, MA USA > 02:20 136 DK7FC de WD2XES Op8 3714 mi -30 dB in Holden, MA USA > > That was in the time frame of a single OP32 transmission, and must > have represented a nice signal peak. > > John, W1TAG/WD2XES > > On 8/28/2012 10:11 PM, Stefan Schäfer wrote: >> Hi both, >> >> Many thanks. It's 4:10 AM here now and i will take some sleep i think >> :-) >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> Am 29.08.2012 04:17, schrieb John Andrews: >>> Stephan, >>> >>> I just got home at 0200Z, and will leave the receiver running in OP8 >>> overnight. >>> >>> John, W1TAG >>> >>> On 8/28/2012 8:01 PM, Stefan Schäfer wrote: >>>> Jay, LF, >>>> >>>> After finishing the next sequence in OP32 (hopefully reaching >>>> UA4WPF) i >>>> would like to try OP8 over to W1. Would you like to try? >>>> >>>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC