Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 163CD38000098; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 09:54:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Scd9X-00020n-Fs for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:53:31 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Scd9W-00020e-O8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:53:30 +0100 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Scd9U-00020u-7j for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:53:29 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjsFALyx0E9cHYyS/2dsb2JhbAArGoVOmHEDlV2BCIITBQEBBAEIAQEDFjMCDxcGAQEDBQIBAxEEAQEKIQICFAEEGgYWCAYTCgECAgEBhgCBbAMGCQcppWOJEROJSIsdhHqBEgONPYhyiWeFAYJggVYFBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,731,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217";a="374667930" Received: from host-92-29-140-146.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.29.140.146]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 07 Jun 2012 14:53:25 +0100 Message-ID: <001101cd44b4$e7635060$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <00ad01cd424c$0138a690$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <00d301cd4255$b6428ac0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <636F5742-6949-4616-9CFD-3FCF99B4506A@gmail.com> <00f301cd4263$4ce62880$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4FCCD78A.6030302@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FD08634.8010402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <000b01cd449e$8ed026a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <989268713.594928.1339069782716.JavaMail.www@wwinf8316> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 13:53:22 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: There are several countries in EU active on 500 Khz CW at present. The info has been posted in the past when countries became active. Check the reflector daily for more info. G, GI, EA. ON, SQ, EI, I1, OK, OM, SM, LA OZ, 9H, PA0, S52, DL4, YO, OH, That is all that I remember working so far but maybe i have missed some, must check my log. These stations are all active on normal CW from around EU and there are others worldwide like W and VE plus others. de mal/g3kev [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.240 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 FSL_UA FSL_UA 0.0 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: e2b7e65dcf7cf6551ab81105a525fe0f Subject: Re: LF: VX9MRC 504.1 kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000E_01CD44B4.E7207B00" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:498564800:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604e4fd0b2967798 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01CD44B4.E7207B00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There are several countries in EU active on 500 Khz CW at present. The info has been posted in the past when countries became active. = Check the reflector daily for more info. G, GI, EA. ON, SQ, EI, I1, OK, OM, SM, LA OZ, 9H, PA0, S52, DL4, YO, = OH,=20 That is all that I remember working so far but maybe i have missed some, = must check my log. These stations are all active on normal CW from = around EU and there are others worldwide like W and VE plus others. de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: manginbenoit.pro=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 11:49 AM Subject: Re: LF: VX9MRC 504.1 kHz Are there other EU countries (apart from the British Isles) granting = MF access to the amateur service so fast ? We in France still did not hear even the smallest whisper from our = tutelage administration. Or maybe am I not well informed. 73 Ben=20 > Message du 07/06/12 13:16 > De : "mal hamilton"=20 > A : rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Copie =C3=A0 :=20 > Objet : Re: LF: VX9MRC 504.1 kHz > > Stefan > I have had QSO's on 500 Khz across the Atlantic also EI0CF many = times during > the winter months. > I work QSO mode only and no beacons. > I have also had some QSO'S with Russian stations, they call me on = 7033 and I > reply on 502 normally although I have vfo control. > I work on CW and if condx get difficult I work QRS3 but not SLOWER > When the new band starts the old 500 khz band will end next = January > Mal/g3kev >=20 >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer"=20 > To:=20 > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 10:45 AM > Subject: Re: LF: VX9MRC 504.1 kHz >=20 >=20 > > Hi Joe, LF, > > > > Yes, we're here of course :-) > > Unfortunately i still cannot receive on MF. My RX is home made = and vy > > narrow band. But i'm going to have a suitable RX in some time. > > BTW, what about all the 500 kHz allocations. What happens to = them when > > the new 475 kHz band becomes permitted? Will you have an = extended > > frequency range then or will you have to QSY? > > And what about the chances of this band? How easy is a TA = detection? > > Would it be possible to have a CW QSO over that 4400 km = distance? > > It would be possible for me to radiate 1 kW ERP on that band, = however > > with a 1W (EIRP of course) limitation, this may become a = problem... > > > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > > > > Am 07.06.2012 02:15, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: > > > > > > Hopefully someone will read this on Baa Baa.... > > > > > > The beacon is running on a new frequency with a CW ID and > > > a 10 second carrier. Reports most welcomed. > > > > > > 73 > > > Joe VO1NA > > > > > > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and = conditions at > > > > = http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.p= hp > > > > > >=20 >=20 >=20 ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01CD44B4.E7207B00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BF
There are several countries in EU active on 500 = Khz CW at=20 present.
The info has been posted in the past  when = countries=20 became active. Check the reflector daily for more info.
G, GI,  EA. ON, SQ, EI, I1, OK, OM, SM, LA = OZ, 9H,=20 PA0, S52, DL4, YO, OH,
That is all that I remember working so far but = maybe i=20 have missed some, must check my log. These stations are all active on = normal CW=20 from around EU and there are others worldwide like W and VE plus=20 others.
de mal/g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 manginbenoit.pro =
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 = 11:49=20 AM
Subject: Re: LF: VX9MRC 504.1 = kHz

Are there other EU countries (apart from the British = Isles)=20 granting MF access to the amateur service so fast ?

We in = France=20 still did not hear even the smallest whisper from our tutelage = administration.=20 Or maybe am I not well=20 informed.

73

Ben 




>=20 Message du 07/06/12 13:16
> De : "mal hamilton"
> A : = rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
>=20 Copie =C3=A0 :
> Objet : Re: LF: VX9MRC 504.1 = kHz
>
>=20 Stefan
> I have had QSO's on 500 Khz across the Atlantic also = EI0CF=20 many times during
> the winter months.
> I work QSO mode = only=20 and no beacons.
> I have also had some QSO'S with Russian = stations,=20 they call me on 7033 and I
> reply on 502 normally although I = have vfo=20 control.
> I work on CW and if condx get difficult I work QRS3 = but not=20 SLOWER
> When the new band starts the old 500 khz band will = end next=20 January
> Mal/g3kev
>
>
> ----- Original = Message=20 -----
> From: "Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer"
> To:
> = Sent: Thursday,=20 June 07, 2012 10:45 AM
> Subject: Re: LF: VX9MRC 504.1 = kHz
>=20
>
> > Hi Joe, LF,
> >
> > Yes, = we're here=20 of course :-)
> > Unfortunately i still cannot receive on = MF. My RX=20 is home made and vy
> > narrow band. But i'm going to have = a=20 suitable RX in some time.
> > BTW, what about all the 500 = kHz=20 allocations. What happens to them when
> > the new 475 kHz = band=20 becomes permitted? Will you have an extended
> > frequency = range=20 then or will you have to QSY?
> > And what about the = chances of=20 this band? How easy is a TA detection?
> > Would it be = possible to=20 have a CW QSO over that 4400 km distance?
> > It would be = possible=20 for me to radiate 1 kW ERP on that band, however
> > with a = 1W=20 (EIRP of course) limitation, this may become a problem...
>=20 >
> > 73, Stefan/DK7FC
> >
> >
> = > Am=20 07.06.2012 02:15, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca:
> > >
> = > >=20 Hopefully someone will read this on Baa Baa....
> > = >
>=20 > > The beacon is running on a new frequency with a CW ID = and
>=20 > > a 10 second carrier. Reports most welcomed.
> >=20 >
> > > 73
> > > Joe VO1NA
> >=20 >
> > > This electronic communication is governed by = the=20 terms and conditions at
> > >
>=20 = http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.p= hp
>=20 > >
> >
>
>
>=20
------=_NextPart_000_000E_01CD44B4.E7207B00--