Return-Path: Received: from mtain-de05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-de05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.205]) by air-mb02.mail.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILINMB021-a18f4deb51c7e4; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 05:52:07 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 75F7F38000086; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 05:52:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QT9yq-0001JZ-OT for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 10:50:48 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QT9yp-0001JQ-Rl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 10:50:47 +0100 Received: from out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.239]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QT9yn-0001qN-F0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 10:50:47 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmkBACJR601cF/8z/2dsb2JhbABTk0ADhBiDRYsbd8ZIhiEEgjiTJoQUhkI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,322,1304290800"; d="scan'208,217";a="349237029" Received: from unknown (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.255.51]) by out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 05 Jun 2011 10:50:39 +0100 Message-ID: <001101cc2366$02cc6dd0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 10:50:32 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: LF: Re: Advanced notice of VLF transmission tests Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000E_01CC236E.644E0070" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cd4deb51c41314 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01CC236E.644E0070 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Use the DX cluster which is more effective and has a large audience. The ai= m should also be to engage in a QSO and not beacon and QSL via email all th= e time G3KEV ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Roger Lapthorn=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org ; sub9khz@yahoogroups.com=20 Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 5:49 PM Subject: LF: Advanced notice of VLF transmission tests All VLF TXing stations,=20 Please will you give advanced notice of intended transmission tests? Ther= e are several stations across Europe (and further afield) trying to look fo= r your signals now but it helps to know when and where to look. I will publ= ish information on the Sub-9kHz Amateur Radio news page but I can't do this= unless you tell me!=20 When signal levels are low and narrow bandwidths plus accurate frequency = calibration needed, the possibilities of success (and more reports) will in= crease if people know about tests in advance. I for one cannot dedicate a P= C and antenna to 24/7 VLF monitoring as I need to turn off other things to = set up and look. I know G3ZJO and others are in a similar situation. Stefan, DK7FC, when are you intending to do some tests from your fixed VL= F station please? 17dB weaker may be copyable here in 424uHz if continuous = carrier. I am really looking forward to this. Thanks Chris G3XIZ for today's test and for the advanced notice. Have a g= ood holiday. 73s Roger G3XBM --=20 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01CC236E.644E0070 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Use the DX cluster which is more effective and= has a=20 large audience. The aim should also be to engage in a QSO and not beacon an= d QSL=20 via email all the time
G3KEV
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 5:49=20 PM
Subject: LF: Advanced notice of VL= F=20 transmission tests

All VLF TXing stations,

Please will you give=20 advanced notice of intended transmission tests? There are several sta= tions=20 across Europe (and further afield) trying to look for your signals now bu= t it=20 helps to know when and where to look. I will publish information on the <= A href=3D"https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/news">Sub-9kHz Amateur = Radio news=20 page but I can't do this unless you tell me!

When signal leve= ls=20 are low and narrow bandwidths plus accurate frequency calibration needed,= the=20 possibilities of success (and more reports) will increase if people know = about=20 tests in advance. I for one cannot dedicate a PC and antenna to 24/7 VLF=20 monitoring as I need to turn off other things to set up and look. I know = G3ZJO=20 and others are in a similar situation.

Stefan, DK7FC, when are you=20 intending to do some tests from your fixed VLF station please? 17dB weake= r may=20 be copyable here in 424uHz if continuous carrier. I am really looking for= ward=20 to this.

Thanks Chris G3XIZ for today's test and for the advanced=20 notice. Have a good holiday.

73s
Roger G3XBM

--
http://g3xbm= -qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
htt= ps://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/

------=_NextPart_000_000E_01CC236E.644E0070--