Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:19:12 +0100 Received: by pih-mxcore18.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Do1kt-0006wv-52 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:19:12 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore18.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Do1kt-0006wl-2E for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:19:11 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Do1kI-00060m-8A for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:18:34 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Do1kH-00060d-D6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:18:33 +0100 Received: from joseph.ncoldns.com ([208.181.178.5] helo=generation.lgisp.net) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Do1lI-0008MN-87 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:19:37 +0100 Received: from p1i5f0 (unknown [204.244.17.103]) by generation.lgisp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C42BB7CEE for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 09:18:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <001101c57d8f$e93cd300$6711f4cc@p1i5f0> From: "Steve McDonald" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <42C3C880.21951.9A8BFF@localhost> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 09:22:27 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: 756 PRO III on LF? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) I'm curious if anyone is using the new Icom 756 PRO III on LF and how it performs? Steve / VE7SL