Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8317 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2002 09:43:45 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 2 Jul 2002 09:43:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 17318 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2002 09:43:05 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 2 Jul 2002 09:43:05 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17PK60-0002vM-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 10:37:16 +0100 Received: from tungsten.btinternet.com ([194.73.73.81]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17PK5z-0002vH-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 10:37:16 +0100 Received: from host62-7-94-155.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([62.7.94.155] helo=dave) by tungsten.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #8) id 17PK5y-0007YH-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 10:37:14 +0100 Message-ID: <001101c221ac$1d3e2a20$9b5e073e@dave> From: "Dave Sergeant" To: "rsgb_lf_group" References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020701143557.00a71c40@POP3.freeler.nl> Subject: LF: Re: Bandplan Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 10:32:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dick PA0SE wrote: >I will use the suggestion by Geri, DK8KW, with a remark that it has not the status >of an official bandplan but should be regarded as a suggestion that has been >accepted by most, but not all, users of the LF band. >I will also add some remarks made by Mike, G3XDV, in a direct e-mail to me. This is partially true. Dick should also look on the RSGB LF site (http://www.g3wkl.freeserve.co.uk/lf/lf_index.htm) where he will find the proposed voluntary bandplan which is to be ratified by IARU region 1 later this year. This bandplan (which I think is identical to Geri's apart from some extra comments) was published in RadCom April 2002 with the comment: 'No rigid band plan is proposed for the 136kHz band, but amateurs are asked to work within the following conventions, giving long-distance communications and experimentation priority' By and large this is consistent with current band practice. 73s Dave G3YMC dsergeant@iee.org dsergeant@btinternet.com http://www.dsergeant.btinternet.co.uk