Return-Path: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>
Received: (qmail 20223 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2000 18:30:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70)  by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 28 Jun 2000 18:30:39 -0000
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 137MU2-00018Y-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:22:46 +0100
Received: from cmailg3.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.195.173]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 137MU1-00018T-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:22:45 +0100
Received: from modem-101.angrim.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.113.101] helo=robing) by cmailg3.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 137MTy-0007Mx-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:22:43 +0100
Message-ID: <001101bfe125$c0b6aca0$6571883e@robing>
From: robin@g3lba.freeserve.co.uk
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <f9.5ca1c4.268b84ac@aol.com>
Subject: Re: LF: Petr's Easygram
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:24:43 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Dividing by Zero is easy.... My Windows PC tries it all the time!!
Robin
----- Original Message -----
From: <WarmSpgs@aol.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Petr's Easygram


> >>I am trying to work out how to use a bandwidth of -10Hz, before
> >> he removes it from the menu!
>
>  >Don't remove this one. It should give better than infinite signal to
>  >noise ratio. You should be able to light a small city with the output
>  >from a signal that you just thought might be on the air.
>
> Actually, I suspect it would take a bandwidth closer to -30Hz to achieve
that
> much output.  But I'm having a little trouble with the maths necessary to
> prove it.  This dividing by zero business is harder than I thought....
>
> 73,
> John  KD4IDY
>
>
>