DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=btinternet.com;
  h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status;
  b=57bN6Pqjo28FIOC/m32gTQ47//Yq1OtRIGo15J23JnxGj2z/mI3Hni50rv50z4gMUgsDjaz6h0AxkMgqakbu8dsrg3KJpoLCNmEeItPulB6KIk8Jon4eAh1GJrVQgjygEE9nfCpimZx2csZgM5lLMR/TJ1M4PcTYWYeGqWyxRh0=  ;
Message-ID: <001001cbf9f7$8dcc5cd0$4001a8c0@lark>
From: "Alan Melia" <alan.melia@btinternet.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <4DA4C478.8000300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4DA596F8.7010007@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4DA5C918.20403@telus.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:26:23 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
Subject: Re: VLF: field strength as a function of frequency curve...
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-8859-15"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Yes well done it was pg 31 of that chapter.
Alan

----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Scott Tilley" <sthed475@telus.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 5:02 PM
Subject: Re: VLF: field strength as a function of frequency curve...


> Hi Stefan/group
>
> This looks it may be the link or at least a very interesting one:
>
> http://www.navy-radio.com/manuals/0101-1xx/0101_113-02.pdf
>
> 73 Scott
> VE7TIL
>
> On 4/13/2011 5:28 AM, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote:
> > VLF,
> >
> > Am 12.04.2011 23:30, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer:
> >> VLF,
> >>
> >> I've just got these graphs by a SWL (or better LWL) out of an unk=
nown
> >> paper.
> >
> > Now i've got the URL for this document:
> >
> > www.navy-radio.com/manuals/0101-1xx/0101_113-06.pdf
> >
> >
> > 73, Stefan/DK7FC
> >
> >
> >
> >> It shows the results of field strength achievements as a function=
 of
> >> the TX frequency for different distances and a given TX power.
> >> Have we all known about this? Me not ;-) Now i understand why the
> >> military stations are located mostly between 15 and 25 kHz...
> >> But 8970 Hz is not much worse, at least distances below 4000 km..=
.
> >>
> >> But that graph tell me it is rather difficult to reach TF3HZ or=
 4X1RF
> >> on 5170 Hz. Anyway we'll see...
> >>
> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
> >
> >
>
>