X-GM-THRID: 1219672016320458980 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 814f401df7b8c8003bfe39a58671bfcd337b0634 Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.78.127.4 with SMTP id z4cs10878huc; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 06:44:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.92.1 with SMTP id u1mr3475618ugl.1163169876846; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 06:44:36 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b23si2481102ugd.2006.11.10.06.44.34; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 06:44:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1GiXTj-0002aM-Ke for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:35:35 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1GiXTj-0002aD-8l for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:35:35 +0000 Received: from yk-mlwprd2.northwestel.ca ([198.235.201.13] helo=mail2.theedge.ca) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GiXTg-0002dr-HT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:35:35 +0000 Received: from Radio (whthyt235-40.northwestel.net [207.189.235.40]) by mail2.theedge.ca (Spam Firewall) with SMTP id 7E7939CDE7 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:34:58 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <001001c704d5$63f9d110$6801a8c0@Radio> From: "J. Allen" To: References: <45541CDB.1050800@online.fr> <455430CB.1050205@online.fr> <000801c704a0$f6e32bf0$6801a8c0@pmchelpdesk1> <455445C7.1020005@online.fr> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:34:55 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 X-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Firewall at theedge.ca X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=0.010 Subject: LF: Auroral Index, E-W path loss, N-S one-way? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6921 The Southern Aurora was seen in Austraila and New Zealand and was seen in the northern hemisphere as far south as the north central states this side of the pond. It is is still visible this morning in Yukon. The level scale goes only to 10 and it had reached a 9 when reported to the group last night (PST). Personal observations at MF and HF have shown the E-W propagation dies and that the N-S path still functions but deteriorates as location approaches or is under the Auroral halo. Often this deterioration is shown as one-way propagation with the northern station being the better receiving station than the southern. I would be interested in knowing if this phenomena repeats at LF. Is there a tendency to loose E-W propagation on LF during an Aurora? Is there also a tendency (recorded) for one-way, for equal stations on a north-south path to have a disparity between received signals, and if so is the northern station usually the one which seems to have its propagation impared for transmission while its reception is not impared as much? Are there LF stations in EU above 60 degrees latitude with operators who will verify or dismiss these observations? J.