Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Sat, 28 May 2005 19:56:43 +0100 Received: by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Dc6UF-0001Hd-Go for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 28 May 2005 19:56:43 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Dc6UF-0001HT-BN for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 28 May 2005 19:56:43 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Dc6Tg-0000en-LV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 May 2005 19:56:08 +0100 Received: from [82.108.183.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Dc6Tg-0000ee-4d for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 May 2005 19:56:08 +0100 Received: from smtp-out1.hurontel.on.ca ([216.46.129.246]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Dc6Tc-0001TX-Ur for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 May 2005 19:56:07 +0100 Received: from mail.hurontel.on.ca (mail.hurontel.on.ca [216.46.129.11]) by smtp-out1.hurontel.on.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j4SIn0RC018664 for ; Sat, 28 May 2005 14:49:00 -0400 Received: from server (dial135-ripley2.hurontel.on.ca [216.46.149.135]) by mail.hurontel.on.ca (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with SMTP id j4SItga2012644 for ; Sat, 28 May 2005 14:55:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <001001c563af$455433e0$87952ed8@server> From: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000c01c55a6e$8d82f740$37d0fc3e@l8p8y6> <000d01c55b45$acb45e60$ac068351@w4o8m9> <002f01c55d97$09df4840$8c802ed8@server> <000901c55d99$bb7d7cf0$0700a8c0@Laptop> <005201c55e00$e1f57ce0$8c802ed8@server> <001901c55e4e$6ceda1e0$0500a8c0@charter.net> Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 19:00:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Subject: LF: Loop success!! (at last) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Hello LFers, A combination of time off and good weather finally let me try out the series tuned into a transformer hookup on my loop. After trying out several ratios, I found that 4:1 seemed to produce the best signal at the receiver. That was achieved with 20 turns on the feedline side and 5 turns on the loop side, wound on a toroid from a computer power supply. Using my portable LF receiver tuned to the loop's frequency and sitting closeby, I noted no drop in the signal strength when I connected up the feedline using the transformer approach. I can tune up or down from the loops tuning setting about 25 kHz. before the signals drop off a bit, so I'm thinking the Q of the loop isn't getting spoiled like it had been by the shielded pickup, which I've left in place but disconnected. On another note, I connected a decade resistor box to the shielded pickup loop pigtail and found that I could go down to around 4700 ohms before I noticed that it started to load down the main loop. I'm going to try hooking a HI-Z input preamp to the pickup loop and see how that compares to the transformer hookup. I placed the parts order today for the preamp shown on page 19 of the Low Frequency Experimenter's Handbook. I want to thank all of you who have helped me through the problem with my big loop, especially to John, W1TAG, and Jim, M0BMU, who had suggested using the series tuned transformer feed method. 73, J.B.