Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22443 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2003 18:31:13 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 1 Jul 2003 18:31:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 17381 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2003 18:31:06 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Jul 2003 18:31:06 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19XPtD-0003Qq-Ox for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2003 19:30:03 +0100 Received: from [62.253.164.44] (helo=mta4-svc.business.ntl.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19XPt9-0003Qc-JP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2003 19:29:59 +0100 Received: from l8p8y6 ([62.252.233.147]) by mta4-svc.business.ntl.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with SMTP id <20030701182958.KXFH18420.mta4-svc.business.ntl.com@l8p8y6> for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 19:29:58 +0100 Message-ID: <001001c33ff6$545b9a60$93e9fc3e@l8p8y6> From: "hamilton mal" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 18:28:54 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: SAQ Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGEversion=2.55 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
In ref to Ian's comment about receiving SAQ. I would be surprised if I could not copy this signal on 17.2 khz because of my antenna system. I resonated my 90m loop for the event whereas others probably used odd bits of wire and hoped for the best!!!!! Perhaps they will tell us if this is incorrect.
I also have a proper LF RX Hagenuk EE 430 10 - 30000 Khz plus two Pegelmessers W & G and Siemens dedicated for LF activities. I also have space diversity facilites using at present 2 antennas, the 90 m loop and the vertical array, both resonated at the frequency required.
For a reception report to be meaningful, the antenna system and RX needs to be specified, otherwise it is misleading information to the transmitting source 
 
My report and a copy of the message received has been sent to the SAQ email address as specified, and I await a QSL
Surely I am not the only one around EU that was able to copy the message.
I am anxiously awaiting to hear signals from further afield like the USA and beyond. During the recent African listening activity I was able to hear and see the Russian stations during daylight hours, as I previously reported. The distance around 3000 kms. The signals were just as strong as during the winter period.
73 de Mal/G3KEV
 
 
73 de Mal/G3KEV/IO94SH